Final Decree of Divorce: What You Need to Know
A comprehensive guide to understanding the Final Decree of Divorce, its legal implications, and important considerations for couples with significant assets, business owners, and parents with minor children.
Introduction
A Final Decree of Divorce is the court document that legally ends your marriage and establishes the terms that will govern your post-divorce life. This critical legal document outlines how your property will be divided, addresses child custody and support arrangements, determines spousal maintenance (if applicable), and resolves other important matters. For couples with significant assets, business interests, or minor children, understanding the components and implications of this decree is essential to protecting your financial future and family relationships. This guide will help you navigate the complexities of a Final Decree of Divorce and understand how it will impact your specific situation.
0/5000
Key Things to Know
- 1
A Final Decree of Divorce is legally binding once signed by a judge, and willful non-compliance can result in serious legal consequences.
- 2
For high-value assets, the specific language in the decree matters tremendously—vague terms can lead to future disputes and enforcement challenges.
- 3
Business valuations should be conducted by qualified experts and the methodology should be clearly referenced in the decree.
- 4
Child custody provisions should be detailed enough to minimize potential conflicts but flexible enough to accommodate changing circumstances as children grow.
- 5
Some provisions in a Final Decree require additional legal documents to implement, such as QDROs for retirement accounts, deeds for real estate transfers, or stock certificates for business interests.
- 6
The decree should include mechanisms for resolving future disputes without returning to court, such as mediation requirements for co-parenting conflicts.
- 7
Tax implications of property division and support arrangements should be carefully considered before finalizing the decree.
- 8
For significant assets, consider including provisions that address appreciation, depreciation, or other changes in value that might occur between the divorce date and actual transfer date.
Key Decisions
Parents with Minor Children
A detailed parenting plan goes beyond basic custody arrangements to address how parents will make decisions, communicate, and resolve disagreements about their children. Without clear provisions, post-divorce parenting conflicts can lead to ongoing stress, repeated court appearances, and negative impacts on children. The provisions you choose will establish the framework for your co-parenting relationship and determine how much structure exists for handling disagreements.
Detailed parenting plan with specific provisions for communication, decision-making processes, and mediation before court action
This comprehensive approach includes specific protocols for how parents will communicate about children, timelines for making various types of decisions, and requirements to attempt mediation before returning to court with disputes. This option provides clear guidance that can prevent conflicts and offers a structured path when disagreements arise. This is increasingly common and generally preferred by courts.
Most Common OptionBasic parenting plan with general guidelines and flexibility for parents to work out details cooperatively
This approach provides general principles rather than specific rules, allowing parents more flexibility to adapt arrangements as needed. It works best when parents have a relatively amicable relationship and can communicate effectively. This approach is common when parents have demonstrated an ability to cooperate despite their divorce.
Highly structured parenting plan with a parenting coordinator appointed to resolve disputes
This approach includes very detailed provisions and appoints a professional parenting coordinator who has authority to make certain decisions when parents cannot agree (without going to court). This is more expensive but can be effective for high-conflict situations. This is less common overall but increasingly used in cases with a history of significant co-parenting conflict.
Maintaining health insurance for children after divorce is crucial and typically required by courts. The divorce decree must specify which parent will provide coverage, how uncovered expenses will be shared, and procedures for making claims and reimbursements. This decision has significant financial implications, as health insurance and medical costs can be substantial. The arrangement you choose affects both your financial obligations and your children's access to healthcare.
One parent provides health insurance through employer plan with uncovered expenses shared proportionally to income
One parent (typically the one with better/more affordable coverage) maintains the children on their employer-provided health insurance, while both parents share uncovered medical expenses (co-pays, deductibles, prescriptions) in proportion to their incomes. This is the most common arrangement when at least one parent has access to good employer-sponsored coverage.
Most Common OptionBoth parents maintain separate health insurance policies for the children
Each parent maintains separate health insurance for the children, with one policy designated as primary and the other as secondary. This provides maximum coverage but can be more expensive overall. This is less common but may be appropriate when both parents have access to different types of beneficial coverage (e.g., one has better medical while the other has better dental/vision).
One parent provides health insurance with the other parent paying a fixed contribution toward the premium
One parent maintains the insurance policy while the other contributes a specific dollar amount toward the premium rather than sharing based on a percentage. The parent not carrying the insurance has a predictable monthly expense, while the insuring parent bears the risk of premium increases. This approach is sometimes used when one parent strongly prefers budget certainty.
Divorce requires dividing assets (like homes, vehicles, retirement accounts, investments) and debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards) acquired during the marriage. This division can significantly impact your financial stability after divorce. While some states require an equal 50/50 split, others use an 'equitable distribution' approach that aims for fairness but not necessarily equality. The division you choose affects your immediate financial situation and long-term financial security.
Equal (50/50) division of all marital assets and debts
This approach divides everything acquired during the marriage equally between spouses. It's straightforward but may not account for differences in earning capacity or non-financial contributions. This is common in community property states and when spouses have similar financial situations and contributions to the marriage.
Most Common OptionEquitable (fair but not necessarily equal) division based on specific factors
This approach divides property based on factors like length of marriage, each spouse's financial situation, contributions to the marriage (including as a homemaker), and future needs. One spouse might receive more assets but also more debt, or certain high-value assets might be traded for others. This is common when spouses have different earning capacities or made different types of contributions to the marriage.
Division that keeps specific assets intact (like businesses or retirement accounts) with offsetting compensation
This approach keeps certain assets whole rather than splitting them, with the spouse who doesn't receive the intact asset getting other assets of comparable value. For example, one spouse keeps a business while the other gets the family home of similar value. This is common when dividing certain assets would significantly reduce their value or create practical problems.
Child support is financial assistance paid by one parent to the other to help cover the costs of raising children after divorce. It typically covers basic necessities like food, housing, clothing, education, and healthcare. Child support amounts are generally calculated based on state guidelines that consider factors such as parents' incomes, the custody arrangement, and the children's needs. The court's primary concern is ensuring the children's financial needs are met, not what either parent might prefer.
Standard guideline child support based on state formulas
This follows your state's mathematical formula for calculating child support, typically based on both parents' incomes, the number of children, and the custody arrangement. This is the most common approach and is generally favored by courts because it provides consistency and predictability.
Most Common OptionDeviation from guideline support with specific justification
This involves requesting an amount different from the standard calculation due to special circumstances such as extraordinary medical expenses, special educational needs, very high or very low income, or other factors that make the guideline amount inappropriate. Courts may approve deviations when there's clear justification that serves the children's best interests.
Alternative support arrangement with direct payment of specific expenses
Rather than one parent paying the other a set amount, parents divide responsibility for specific expenses (e.g., one pays school tuition directly while the other covers medical insurance). This is less common and requires detailed documentation in the decree. Courts may be reluctant to approve this approach unless both parents demonstrate high levels of cooperation and financial responsibility.
Child custody has two components: legal custody (decision-making authority for major issues like education, healthcare, and religion) and physical custody (where the child lives). Your custody arrangement will significantly impact your children's daily lives and your parental rights. Courts generally favor arrangements that allow children to maintain meaningful relationships with both parents, unless there are concerns about a parent's fitness. The custody arrangement you choose will determine how much input you have in important decisions affecting your children and how much time you spend with them.
Joint legal and joint physical custody (approximately equal time with both parents)
This arrangement gives both parents equal decision-making authority and roughly equal physical time with the children. It works best when parents live relatively close to each other, can communicate effectively, and are both actively involved in their children's lives. Children typically alternate between households on a regular schedule.
Most Common OptionJoint legal custody with primary physical custody to one parent and regular visitation to the other
This arrangement gives both parents equal say in major decisions, but children primarily live with one parent while having regular scheduled time with the other parent. This option is common when parents live farther apart, have very different work schedules, or when maintaining one primary residence provides more stability for the children.
Sole legal and physical custody to one parent with visitation rights to the other parent
This arrangement gives one parent exclusive decision-making authority and primary physical custody, with the other parent having scheduled visitation. This is less common and typically ordered only when there are significant concerns about one parent's ability to make sound decisions or provide proper care (such as cases involving substance abuse, domestic violence, or severe mental health issues).
Long-Term Marriage Partners with Significant Assets
For couples with significant assets, business interests or professional practices often represent substantial value and income sources. Dividing these assets presents unique challenges because businesses aren't easily liquidated or divided without potentially destroying their value. The business may be the primary income source for one or both spouses, making its continuity crucial. Valuation of businesses can be complex and often requires professional appraisers. How you handle business interests will affect not just asset division but also future income potential and possibly career identity for the spouse who operates the business.
One spouse retains the business and compensates the other spouse for their share with other assets
This approach keeps the business intact under one spouse's control (typically the one who operates it) while providing the other spouse with different assets of equivalent value. It's the most common approach as it preserves the business's value and operations. This option works well when there are sufficient other assets to create an equitable overall division.
Most Common OptionSell the business and divide the proceeds
This approach liquidates the business interest and divides the cash proceeds. It's less common but may be necessary when the business represents the majority of marital assets or when there's no agreement on valuation. This option provides a clean break but may sacrifice business value and future income potential.
Continue co-ownership of the business with defined roles and profit-sharing
This approach maintains joint ownership with clear agreements about management, decision-making, and profit distribution. It's relatively uncommon and generally only works when spouses can maintain an amicable business relationship despite divorce. This option preserves the business but requires ongoing cooperation and can complicate the emotional separation process.
The family home is often both the largest asset and the most emotionally significant property in a divorce. For long-term marriages, the home may have substantial equity and carry strong emotional attachments. Deciding what happens to the home impacts not just finances but also stability and lifestyle. This decision involves considering mortgage obligations, tax implications, maintenance costs, and emotional factors. The choice you make about the marital home will have immediate practical consequences for where each spouse will live after divorce and can significantly affect your financial position.
Sell the home and divide the proceeds
This approach provides a clean break and immediate division of equity. It's common when neither spouse can afford to maintain the home alone or when both want to start fresh. This option eliminates joint ownership complications but requires both parties to establish new residences.
Most Common OptionOne spouse keeps the home and buys out the other spouse's equity share
This approach allows one spouse (often the one with primary custody of children or stronger emotional attachment to the home) to remain in the house by compensating the other spouse for their share of equity. This typically requires refinancing the mortgage in one spouse's name. This option provides continuity for one spouse but concentrates a large portion of assets in a single, illiquid investment.
Defer sale of the home until a future triggering event (such as youngest child finishing school)
This approach postpones the sale while allowing continued use of the home, often to provide stability for children. It requires detailed agreements about who pays for mortgage, taxes, insurance, and maintenance during the interim period. This option delays final resolution but can serve important family needs during transition periods.
Spousal support (also called alimony or maintenance) is particularly relevant in long-term marriages where one spouse may have sacrificed career opportunities to support the family or where there's a significant disparity in earning capacity. The purpose of spousal support is to help the lower-earning spouse maintain a standard of living comparable to what was established during the marriage. The amount and duration of support depend on factors like the length of marriage, age and health of both parties, earning capacity, and contributions to the marriage. This decision can have substantial long-term financial implications for both parties.
Temporary spousal support for a defined period to allow the recipient to become self-supporting
This approach provides support for a limited time, often tied to specific goals like completing education or training. It's common in cases where the recipient spouse needs time to reenter the workforce or enhance earning capacity. This option balances providing support while encouraging financial independence.
Most Common OptionPermanent or long-term spousal support until retirement or a significant life change
This approach is more common in very long marriages (20+ years) where one spouse has limited earning capacity due to age, health, or long absence from the workforce. It provides ongoing financial security for a spouse who may never achieve financial parity with the higher-earning spouse. This option recognizes the permanent economic impact of long-term marital roles.
Lump-sum payment or property transfer instead of ongoing spousal support
This approach provides a one-time settlement rather than ongoing payments. It creates a clean financial break and eliminates future entanglements. This option works well when there are sufficient assets to provide adequate compensation upfront and when both parties prefer to avoid ongoing financial ties.
Retirement assets often represent a substantial portion of wealth in long-term marriages. These assets require special handling during divorce because they're subject to specific tax rules and may need special court orders (Qualified Domestic Relations Orders or QDROs) to divide without tax penalties. How you divide these assets can significantly impact both spouses' retirement security. Some retirement benefits accumulated during long marriages may be substantial, and proper division is crucial for ensuring financial stability in later years.
Divide all retirement accounts proportionally based on the same percentage as other marital assets
This approach applies your overall asset division percentage to retirement accounts. It's straightforward and treats retirement assets the same as other property. This option is common when both spouses have similar retirement needs.
Most Common OptionEach spouse keeps their own retirement accounts and offsets the value with other assets
This approach avoids the need for QDROs and complex division of retirement accounts by allowing each spouse to keep their own accounts intact while adjusting the division of other assets to maintain overall fairness. This option simplifies administration but requires careful valuation of present value versus future value.
Divide only the marital portion of retirement accounts (accumulated during the marriage)
This approach recognizes that portions of retirement accounts earned before marriage or after separation may be separate property. It requires calculating the marital portion of each account based on the duration of the marriage relative to the period of employment. This option is more complex but can be more equitable when accounts were partially funded before marriage.
In a divorce after a long-term marriage with significant assets, property division is one of the most consequential aspects of your decree. Marital property generally includes assets acquired during the marriage, regardless of whose name is on the title. This can include your home, retirement accounts, investments, businesses, vehicles, and other valuable items. How you divide these assets will significantly impact your financial future. While many states follow 'equitable distribution' principles (fair but not necessarily equal division), others are 'community property' states (generally equal division). Your choice here will form the foundation of your post-divorce financial situation.
Equal 50/50 division of all marital assets
This is the most straightforward approach and is common in community property states. It provides a clean break but may not account for individual contributions or needs. This option works well when both spouses have similar earning capacity and financial situations.
Most Common OptionUnequal division based on contributions and future needs
This approach considers factors like each spouse's contribution to acquiring assets, length of marriage, age, health, and future earning capacity. It's common in equitable distribution states and may result in one spouse receiving more than 50% of assets. This option often requires more detailed negotiation but can better address disparities in earning potential.
Division by asset type rather than percentage (e.g., one spouse keeps the house, the other keeps retirement accounts of similar value)
This approach focuses on dividing specific assets rather than splitting each asset. It can be practical when certain assets have sentimental value or when liquidating would create tax consequences. This option requires careful valuation of assets to ensure overall fairness.
Business Owners
Business owners often have flexibility in how they receive compensation, which can impact support obligations and property division. Salary, bonuses, distributions, perks, retirement contributions, and other benefits may all be considered in determining income for support purposes. How these various forms of compensation are characterized and treated post-divorce affects both spouses' financial situations. This question addresses how business-derived income will be handled to ensure fairness while allowing the business to continue operating successfully.
Standardized salary determination for support calculations
The business owner's income for support purposes is based on a standardized salary determination (such as industry averages or historical compensation), regardless of actual distributions taken. This provides predictability but may not reflect business fluctuations.
Most Common OptionPercentage-based approach to business profits
Support payments fluctuate based on a percentage of business profits or owner distributions. This approach allows payments to reflect business performance but creates uncertainty and may incentivize manipulation of business finances.
Fixed support with periodic review based on business performance
Support amounts are fixed but subject to scheduled reviews based on business performance metrics. This balances predictability with recognition of business realities and provides a structured mechanism for adjustments.
Intellectual property (patents, trademarks, copyrights) and business goodwill (reputation, customer relationships, brand value) can represent significant value in a business but are often difficult to quantify. These intangible assets may have been developed during the marriage and thus could be considered marital property subject to division. How these assets are valued and divided can substantially impact the overall divorce settlement, particularly for service businesses or those with strong brand recognition.
Include goodwill and IP in overall business valuation
Intellectual property and goodwill are considered part of the business's total value, with the non-business spouse receiving compensation based on this comprehensive valuation. This recognizes the full value created during marriage but may result in higher buyout costs for the business-retaining spouse.
Most Common OptionSeparate personal from enterprise goodwill
Only enterprise goodwill (transferable business value) is included in the marital estate, while personal goodwill (tied to individual skills/reputation) remains with the individual spouse. This approach is common in professional practices and recognizes that some value cannot be transferred.
Licensing or royalty arrangement for intellectual property
The non-business spouse receives ongoing payments based on the use of intellectual property developed during marriage. This approach recognizes continued value creation but creates ongoing financial ties between ex-spouses.
Business debts and liabilities can significantly impact the overall financial settlement in a divorce. These may include business loans, lines of credit, vendor contracts, lease obligations, and potential legal liabilities. How these debts are allocated affects both spouses' financial futures and credit standings. For business owners, ensuring that business debt responsibilities are clearly defined prevents future disputes and protects the ongoing operation of the business.
Business-retaining spouse assumes all business debts
The spouse who keeps the business takes responsibility for all associated debts and liabilities, with legal indemnification for the other spouse. This creates a clean separation but may require refinancing loans to remove the non-business spouse from obligations.
Most Common OptionProportional division of business debts
Business debts are divided proportionally based on each spouse's ownership interest or benefit received. This approach may be considered fair but can create ongoing financial entanglements and shared liability risks.
Offset business debts against other marital assets
Business debts are factored into the overall marital estate calculation, with the spouse retaining the business receiving fewer other assets to account for debt burden. This approach balances the overall settlement but may require sufficient other assets to create an equitable division.
Establishing the value of a business is often one of the most contentious aspects of a divorce involving business owners. The method used to value the business can significantly impact the final settlement amount. Different valuation approaches can yield vastly different results, and the chosen method should reflect the nature of your business, industry standards, and other relevant factors. This determination affects how much one spouse may need to pay the other if keeping the business, or how proceeds will be divided if the business is sold.
Joint business valuation by a single neutral expert
Both parties agree to hire one independent business appraiser who conducts a valuation that both sides accept. This approach is typically less expensive and contentious than competing valuations, though it requires trust in the selected expert's impartiality.
Most Common OptionSeparate business valuations by each spouse's expert
Each spouse hires their own business valuation expert, and the court considers both reports or the parties negotiate based on the different valuations. This approach allows each side to present their best case but increases costs and often leads to significant discrepancies that must be resolved.
Formula-based valuation agreed upon in advance
The parties agree to a specific formula or method to determine business value (such as multiple of earnings, book value, or another industry-specific approach). This can simplify the process if both parties can agree on a fair formula, but may not capture all value factors.
Business ownership presents unique challenges in divorce proceedings. The court must determine whether the business is separate property (owned before marriage or acquired through inheritance/gift), community property (acquired during marriage), or a mixture of both. The valuation method and division approach significantly impact your financial future and the business's operational stability. This question addresses how your business assets will be treated, which is especially critical for business owners who need to protect their livelihood while ensuring a fair division of marital assets.
Complete buyout of spouse's interest in the business
This option involves one spouse retaining full ownership of the business while compensating the other spouse for their share, often through a lump sum payment or by trading other marital assets of equivalent value. This creates a clean break but requires sufficient liquid assets or other property to offset the business value.
Most Common OptionContinued co-ownership after divorce
Both spouses maintain ownership interests in the business and continue to operate it together post-divorce. This option avoids the need for immediate valuation and buyout but requires a functional working relationship between ex-spouses and clear management agreements.
Selling the business and dividing proceeds
The business is sold to a third party, and the proceeds are divided between spouses according to their ownership interests. This provides a clean financial break but may result in loss of livelihood and potentially lower value if forced to sell quickly.
Long-term Married Couples with Significant Assets
For couples with significant assets, business interests or professional practices often represent a substantial portion of marital wealth. These assets present unique challenges in divorce because they're not easily divided and their value is often tied to one spouse's ongoing involvement. The approach you choose will affect not only financial outcomes but potentially career trajectories and business relationships as well.
Buy-out (spouse who operates the business keeps it and compensates the other spouse for their share)
This is the most common approach when one spouse is actively involved in running the business. It allows business continuity while providing the non-operating spouse with their fair share of the asset's value, often paid through other assets or a structured payment plan.
Most Common OptionCo-ownership (continue to share ownership after divorce)
Less common but sometimes chosen when both spouses are actively involved in the business and can maintain a working relationship despite the divorce. This requires clear agreements about roles, responsibilities, dispute resolution, and eventual exit strategies.
Sell the business and divide proceeds
Sometimes necessary when neither spouse can afford to buy out the other or when continued cooperation is impossible. This approach provides a clean break but may result in significant financial loss compared to the business's value as a going concern.
The family home is often both the largest asset and the most emotionally significant property in a divorce. For long-term marriages, the home may have substantial equity and may be fully or nearly paid off. Deciding what happens to the home has major financial implications and can also affect emotional adjustment to the divorce. Tax considerations, mortgage qualification, and maintenance costs should all factor into this decision.
Sell the home and divide the proceeds
This is the cleanest approach financially and provides both parties with capital to establish new homes. It's often the default when neither party can afford to maintain the home alone or when both want a fresh start.
Most Common OptionOne spouse keeps the home and buys out the other's interest
Common when one spouse has a strong attachment to the home or when it makes sense for children to remain in their established environment. This requires refinancing to remove the departing spouse from the mortgage and a fair valuation of the home's equity.
Deferred sale (continue co-ownership for a defined period before selling)
Sometimes chosen when minor children are still in the home or when the current market conditions are unfavorable for selling. This approach requires clear agreements about who pays for maintenance, taxes, and the mortgage during the co-ownership period.
Spousal support (also called alimony or maintenance) is often awarded in long-term marriages, especially when there's a significant disparity in earning capacity between spouses. The purpose is to help the lower-earning spouse maintain a standard of living comparable to what was established during the marriage. For marriages lasting decades, permanent or long-term support may be appropriate, particularly if one spouse left the workforce or took lower-paying jobs to support the family or the other spouse's career.
Term-limited support (payments for a specific period to allow the recipient time to become self-supporting)
Common for marriages where both spouses have careers but one earns significantly less. The duration often correlates with the length of the marriage, with longer marriages resulting in longer support periods.
Most Common OptionPermanent support (continuing until either party's death or the recipient's remarriage)
More common in very long-term marriages (20+ years) where one spouse has limited earning capacity due to age, health, or long absence from the workforce. This provides ongoing financial security for the dependent spouse.
Lump-sum payment instead of ongoing support
Less common but sometimes preferred when the paying spouse has substantial assets and both parties want a clean financial break. This approach eliminates future entanglement but requires careful calculation of an appropriate amount.
Retirement accounts and pensions often represent a significant portion of marital wealth, especially for long-term marriages. These assets are typically divided through specific legal instruments like Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs). The division of these assets requires careful consideration of tax implications, early withdrawal penalties, and future growth potential. How you divide these assets can significantly impact both parties' retirement security.
Proportional division of each retirement account (each spouse receives a percentage of each account)
This is the most common approach, often implemented through QDROs. It provides both parties with a mix of retirement assets and is generally considered the most equitable approach for long-term marriages.
Most Common OptionOffset approach (one spouse keeps their retirement accounts intact while the other receives other assets of equivalent value)
This approach avoids the need for QDROs and administrative complexity but requires accurate valuation of retirement assets, accounting for their tax-deferred status and potential growth.
Deferred distribution (decision on how to divide retirement benefits is postponed until retirement)
Less common but sometimes used for defined benefit pensions. This approach delays the actual division until benefits are being paid out, which can be beneficial in certain circumstances but creates ongoing entanglement.
In a divorce, all property and assets acquired during the marriage (regardless of whose name they're in) are typically considered marital property subject to division. For long-term marriages with significant assets, this division can be complex and may include homes, retirement accounts, investments, businesses, and personal property. The approach you choose will significantly impact your financial future. While courts generally aim for an equitable (fair) division, this doesn't necessarily mean a 50/50 split. Factors like each spouse's earning capacity, contributions to the marriage, and future financial needs are considered.
Equal (50/50) division of all marital assets
This is the most straightforward approach and is common in many jurisdictions. It provides a clean break but may not account for differences in earning capacity or non-financial contributions to the marriage.
Most Common OptionUnequal division based on specific factors (e.g., one spouse keeping the family home in exchange for the other receiving more retirement assets)
This approach is common for couples with complex asset portfolios or when one spouse has significantly lower earning potential. It allows for more customization but requires careful valuation of assets to ensure fairness.
Division that maintains certain joint ownership interests (e.g., continuing to co-own a business or investment property)
Less common but sometimes chosen when completely dividing certain assets would diminish their value or when both parties want to maintain involvement in a business. This approach requires ongoing cooperation and clear agreements about management and eventual disposition.
Final Decree of Divorce Requirements
Court and Case Identification
Include the court name, case number, county, and state where the divorce is filed.
Party Information
Full legal names of both parties (petitioner and respondent), including any name changes to be granted as part of the divorce.
Marriage Details
Date and location of marriage, and confirmation that the marriage has become insupportable.
Jurisdiction and Venue
Statement confirming the court has jurisdiction over the case and parties, including residency requirements.
Grounds for Divorce
Legal grounds upon which the divorce is granted (e.g., insupportability/irreconcilable differences, cruelty, adultery, etc.).