Rhode Island Non-Disclosure Agreement Requirements
Rhode Island's Noncompetition Agreement Act does more than exempt NDAs from its noncompete ban: it affirmatively preserves an employer's right to bind an employee not to share trade secret information, including after the employment relationship ends, so a Rhode Island NDA's confidentiality duties can outlast the employment relationship itself even though a noncompete against a protected worker could not.
Introduction
Rhode Island's Noncompetition Agreement Act does more than exempt NDAs from its noncompete ban: it affirmatively preserves an employer's right to bind an employee not to share trade secret information, including after the employment relationship ends, so a Rhode Island NDA's confidentiality duties can outlast the employment relationship itself even though a noncompete against a protected worker could not. That NDA exclusion runs alongside the Act's ban, effective since January 15, 2020, against four categories of workers, including anyone earning at or below 250% of the federal poverty level. A Non-Disclosure Agreement in Rhode Island is an ordinary contract in which one or both parties agree to keep specified information confidential, and it remains enforceable on its own terms even where a companion noncompete clause would not be. Rhode Island also protects trade secrets separately under its own Uniform Trade Secrets Act (General Laws Sections 6-41-1 through 6-41-11), and a misappropriation claim generally must be filed within three years of when the misappropriation was discovered or reasonably should have been. Rhode Island has no statute limiting how an NDA or employment agreement can require an employee to assign inventions to the employer, unlike California, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington. The practical effect for drafting is that a Rhode Island NDA can stay narrowly focused on confidentiality without running into the same restraint-of-trade risk some other states impose, as long as it does not also try to function as a noncompete against one of the four protected categories of workers.
Key Things to Know
- 1
Trade secret protection runs through the Rhode Island Uniform Trade Secrets Act (General Laws Sections 6-41-1 through 6-41-11), separate from whatever the NDA itself says.
- 2
That exclusion means a Rhode Island NDA's confidentiality provisions are not automatically at risk just because the Act restricts noncompetes. The Act goes further and affirmatively lets an employer bind an employee not to share trade secret information, including after the employment relationship ends (General Laws Section 28-59-3(c)).
- 3
Rhode Island's Noncompetition Agreement Act (General Laws Section 28-59-1 et seq., effective January 15, 2020) bans noncompete agreements against four categories of workers, nonexempt employees, interns and students, workers 18 or younger, and low-wage employees earning at or below 250% of the federal poverty level, but it explicitly excludes nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements from that definition.
- 4
A trade secret misappropriation claim in Rhode Island generally must be filed within three years of when the misappropriation was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered (General Laws Section 6-41-6).
- 5
Rhode Island has no statute limiting an employer's ability to require an employee to assign inventions developed on their own time, unlike California, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington. An invention-assignment clause in a Rhode Island NDA is governed by ordinary contract law rather than a specific statutory carve-out.
- 6
Mutual NDAs, where both sides share confidential information, and one-way NDAs, where only one side does, are both ordinary enforceable contracts in Rhode Island; which one fits depends on whether the exchange runs both directions, like a partnership or acquisition discussion, or one direction, like pitching an investor.
- 7
A Rhode Island court can order injunctive relief to stop an ongoing or threatened breach of a valid NDA, in addition to any damages the disclosure caused.
Key decisions before you file
Before you file a Non-Disclosure Agreement in Rhode Island, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Non-Disclosure Agreement guide walks through them.
Open the Non-Disclosure Agreement guideCustomize your Non-Disclosure Agreement Template with DocDraft
Rhode Island Requirements for Non-Disclosure Agreement
Compliance with the Rhode Island Uniform Trade Secrets Act (RIUTSA), which provides legal protection for trade secrets in Rhode Island. The NDA must define trade secrets in accordance with this law and establish safeguards that meet the 'reasonable efforts' standard to maintain secrecy.
Acknowledgment of the federal protection available under the DTSA, which provides a federal cause of action for trade secret misappropriation and includes provisions for ex parte seizure orders in extraordinary circumstances. The NDA should include notice of whistleblower immunity provisions required by this law.
Recognition that theft of trade secrets may constitute a federal crime under the Economic Espionage Act, providing criminal penalties for trade secret theft intended to benefit foreign entities or for commercial advantage.
Acknowledgment that unauthorized access to computer systems to obtain confidential information may violate Rhode Island's computer crime laws, which prohibit unauthorized access to computer systems and data, including for fraudulent purposes under Section 11-52-2.
Specification that actions for misappropriation under Rhode Island law must be brought within three years after the misappropriation is discovered or should have been discovered through reasonable diligence.
Recognition that electronic signatures are valid under both Rhode Island's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act and the federal ESIGN Act, allowing for electronic execution of the NDA.
Ensures that any restrictive covenant embedded in the agreement is reasonable and, more importantly, that the confidentiality provisions themselves are not swept into Rhode Island's Noncompetition Agreement Act, effective January 15, 2020. Section 28-59-2(8)(vi) expressly excludes nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements from the Act's definition of noncompetition agreement, and Section 28-59-3(c) affirmatively preserves an employer's right to bind an employee not to share trade secret information, including after employment ends.
Specifies available remedies for breach, including injunctive relief for actual or threatened misappropriation and, in exceptional circumstances, reasonable-royalty conditioning, consistent with Rhode Island's Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Addresses the allocation of attorney's fees to the prevailing party where a misappropriation claim or a motion to terminate an injunction is brought or resisted in bad faith, or where the underlying misappropriation was willful and malicious.
Recognition that certain confidential information may constitute material non-public information under federal securities laws, prohibiting insider trading based on such information.
Provisions addressing compliance with Rhode Island's Identity Theft Protection Act and other applicable privacy laws if the confidential information includes personal information of Rhode Island residents.
Requirements for notification in the event of a data breach involving confidential information, in compliance with Rhode Island's data breach notification law, including the applicable notification windows and attorney general and credit-bureau reporting thresholds.
If financial information is involved, acknowledgment of obligations under the GLBA regarding the disclosure of nonpublic personal information by financial institutions.
If health information is involved, provisions ensuring compliance with HIPAA and Rhode Island's health care information confidentiality law regarding the protection of personal health information.
Recognition that misappropriation of trade secrets or confidential information may constitute an unfair trade practice under Rhode Island's Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
Section 9-1-13 sets Rhode Island's general ten-year limitations period for civil actions, which applies by default to a breach-of-contract claim over the NDA itself when no more specific statute controls.
Frequently Asked Questions
A Non-Disclosure Agreement in Rhode Island is an ordinary contract in which one or both parties agree to keep specified information confidential. It can be mutual, where both sides share confidential information, or one-way, where only one side does. Trade secrets shared under the agreement are also separately protected by the Rhode Island Uniform Trade Secrets Act (General Laws Sections 6-41-1 through 6-41-11) regardless of what the NDA itself says.
It depends on who is being restricted. The Rhode Island Noncompetition Agreement Act (General Laws Section 28-59-1 et seq.) bans noncompete agreements against nonexempt employees, interns and students, employees 18 or younger, and low-wage employees earning at or below 250% of the federal poverty level. Ordinary confidentiality provisions in an NDA are not swept into that ban since the Act excludes nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements from its definition of noncompetition agreement, but a clause that functions as a de facto noncompete against one of those four protected categories can still run into the Act.
No, not to the confidentiality provisions themselves. General Laws Section 28-59-2(8)(vi) explicitly excludes nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements from the statute's definition of noncompetition agreement, and Section 28-59-3(c) affirmatively preserves an employer's right to bind an employee not to share trade secret information, including after the employee is no longer employed.
A trade secret misappropriation claim under the Rhode Island Uniform Trade Secrets Act generally must be brought within three years after the misappropriation is discovered, or after it reasonably should have been discovered with reasonable diligence (General Laws Section 6-41-6). A separate breach-of-contract claim over the NDA itself follows Rhode Island's ordinary written-contract limitations period.
Rhode Island has no statute limiting how far an invention-assignment clause can reach, unlike California, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington. Whether an invention-assignment provision in a Rhode Island NDA or employment agreement covers something an employee developed entirely on their own time is governed by ordinary contract law and the specific wording of the agreement, not a statutory carve-out.
It depends on whether confidential information will flow in both directions or only one. A mutual NDA fits a two-way exchange, such as a merger, partnership, or joint-venture discussion where both sides disclose sensitive information. A one-way NDA fits a one-directional exchange, such as pitching a business plan to an investor who is not sharing anything confidential back. Both forms are equally enforceable in Rhode Island; the choice is about which structure matches the actual relationship.
No. A Rhode Island NDA is an ordinary contract, not a formal instrument like a will or power of attorney, so it does not require notarization or witnesses to be valid. It only needs the standard elements of a valid contract: an offer, acceptance, and consideration, along with signatures from the parties being bound.
The non-breaching party can seek injunctive relief to stop an ongoing or threatened disclosure, along with damages caused by the breach. If the disclosed information also qualifies as a trade secret, the Rhode Island Uniform Trade Secrets Act provides an additional, independent basis for relief, including damages for actual loss and unjust enrichment, separate from whatever remedies the NDA itself specifies.