Filing a Workplace Harassment Complaint in South Dakota
Reviewed by DocDraft Legal Team - South Dakota - Last updated September 15, 2026
South Dakota gives 180 days. SDCL 20-13-31 is one sentence: any charge filed under the chapter shall be filed within one hundred eighty days after the alleged discriminatory or unfair practice occurred. There is no discovery rule, and there is no continuing violation provision anywhere in the chapter or in the Division's rules, so the clock runs from the date of the act. That matters more here than in most states, because South Dakota is one of the places where the state deadline is the shorter of the two. Since South Dakota has a functioning fair employment agency, the federal EEOC charge period is 300 days rather than 180. The state charge dies at 180. Between roughly day 181 and day 300 a South Dakota worker can have a live federal charge and a state claim that is already gone. Any page that gives you one number without saying which claim it belongs to is giving you half the answer. The route to a courtroom is the other thing to understand before you file. The enforcement structure is split: the Division of Human Rights inside the Department of Labor and Regulation receives, investigates and passes upon charges under SDCL 20-13-28, and a separate State Commission of Human Rights holds hearings. The only path from an employment charge to a circuit court is the election in SDCL 20-13-35.1, and it opens only after the Commission issues a notice under SDCL 20-13-35 requiring the respondent to answer the charge at a hearing, which it does only if the commission determines that the circumstances warrant. Once that notice issues, either party has twenty days to elect court. Coverage, by contrast, is as broad as it gets: SDCL 20-13-1(7) defines employer as any person within the state who hires or employs any employee, with no headcount at all. If what you are facing involves assault, threats or stalking, contact emergency services and speak with an attorney rather than starting with a complaint form.
Find out where you stand in South Dakota
Where are you with the harassment complaint?
DocDraft provides document preparation, not legal advice.
How long do I have to file a workplace harassment complaint in South Dakota?
One hundred eighty days for the state charge. SDCL 20-13-31 provides that any charge filed under the chapter shall be filed within one hundred eighty days after the alleged discriminatory or unfair practice occurred. The federal deadline is different and longer, because South Dakota has a state agency enforcing a law prohibiting the same discrimination, which extends the EEOC charge period to 300 days. Those two numbers belong to two different claims. If you are past 180 days the state route has closed even though the federal one may still be open, and that gap is worth raising with a lawyer immediately.
Does the South Dakota clock restart with the most recent incident of harassment?
Nothing in South Dakota law says it does. SDCL 20-13-31 runs the period from the date the alleged discriminatory or unfair practice occurred, and neither the chapter nor the Division's rules in article 20:03 contain a continuing violation provision or a rule running the period from the date the conduct stopped. Some states have such a rule and South Dakota does not, so do not carry one over from another state's guidance. Count from the earliest incident you want your charge to cover, and if the conduct is ongoing, do not wait for it to end before filing.
Do I have to file with the state agency before I can sue in South Dakota?
Yes, and there is more to it than that. The chapter provides no independent private lawsuit that you can start on your own. The only civil action is the election in SDCL 20-13-35.1, which becomes available only after the Commission of Human Rights issues a notice under SDCL 20-13-35 requiring the respondent to answer the charge at a hearing, and it issues that notice only if the commission determines that the circumstances warrant. So the charge is not just a prerequisite. Whether the route to court opens at all is a decision the agency makes.
The state charge expires four months before the federal one does, and whether your case ever reaches a courtroom is a decision the agency makes rather than you.
The state deadline is 180 days and the federal one is longer, which is the reverse of the pattern in many states. SDCL 20-13-31 requires any charge under the chapter to be filed within one hundred eighty days after the alleged discriminatory or unfair practice occurred. Because South Dakota has a state agency enforcing a law prohibiting the same discrimination, the EEOC charge period is extended to 300 days. Days 181 through 300 are therefore a window in which your federal claim is alive and your state claim is not, so work to the 180.
Relevant Laws
SDCL 20-13-31: 180 Days From the Date the Practice Occurred
Any charge under the chapter must be filed within one hundred eighty days after the alleged discriminatory or unfair practice occurred. The chapter and the Division's rules contain no discovery rule and no continuing violation provision.
SDCL 20-13-35: Only the Commission Can Open the Route to Court
The Commission issues a written notice requiring the respondent to answer the charge at a hearing only if it determines that the circumstances warrant. Without that notice the election to go to circuit court never becomes available.
SDCL 20-13-35.1: The Election Ends the Agency's Jurisdiction
Upon receipt of notice of election, the Division of Human Rights and the Commission of Human Rights have no further jurisdiction over the parties concerning the charge. There is no route back to the administrative process.
SDCL 20-13-28.1: A No-Probable-Cause Dismissal Goes to Administrative Appeal
Where the Division determines there is no probable cause it issues an order dismissing the charge, which is final agency action for purposes of appeal under chapter 1-26. That is review on the agency record rather than a new lawsuit.
SDCL 20-13-1(7) and 20-13-10: Any Employee Counts, and Interns Are Named
Employer means any person in the state who hires or employs any employee, with no threshold, plus any person elsewhere whose employee works partly or wholly in the state. Section 20-13-10 protects any person, employee, or intern, and interns include those who work without pay.
Regional Variances
How South Dakota differs
There is no continuing violation rule in South Dakota
There is no continuing violation rule in South Dakota, and that is a checked absence rather than an oversight. SDCL 20-13-31 says only after the alleged discriminatory or unfair practice occurred. Neither the statute nor the Division's rules in article 20:03 contain a provision running the period from the last act or from the date the practice stopped. Do not assume the last incident restarts the clock the way it does in some other states, and count from the earliest conduct you want the charge to cover.
You cannot take an employment claim straight to court
You cannot take an employment claim straight to court in South Dakota. The only civil action the chapter provides is the election under SDCL 20-13-35.1, and it requires two things to have already happened. The Division must have investigated and concluded that further endeavor to settle by conference or conciliation is futile, and the Commission must then have decided, if the commission determines that the circumstances warrant, to issue a written notice under SDCL 20-13-35 requiring the respondent to answer the charge at a hearing. No notice means no election window, ever.
When the window opens it lasts twenty days, and
When the window opens it lasts twenty days, and your employer can use it too. SDCL 20-13-35.1 provides that no later than twenty days after the issuance of notice requiring the respondent to answer the charge, the charging party or the respondent may elect to have the claims asserted in the charge decided in a civil action, in lieu of a hearing, so either side acting alone can move the case into circuit court. The election is final: upon receipt of notice of election the Division of Human Rights or the Commission of Human Rights has no further jurisdiction over the parties concerning the charge filed. The statute requires the notice to tell you about this right and requires the agency to notify the parties of the election and of the one year limitation period, but diarise the date of the notice yourself.
Suggested Compliance Checklist
SDCL 20-13-35.1: The Election Ends the Agency's Jurisdiction
See your deadline days after startingUpon receipt of notice of election, the Division of Human Rights and the Commission of Human Rights have no further jurisdiction over the parties concerning the charge. There is no route back to the administrative process.
SDCL 20-13-35.1: One Year to Sue, Running From the Notice of Election
See your deadline days after startingAny civil action must be filed within one year of the election, and the limitation period begins on the date of the notice of election rather than on the date of the conduct.
SDCL 20-13-28.1: A No-Probable-Cause Dismissal Goes to Administrative Appeal
See your deadline days after startingWhere the Division determines there is no probable cause it issues an order dismissing the charge, which is final agency action for purposes of appeal under chapter 1-26. That is review on the agency record rather than a new lawsuit.
SDCL 20-13-1(7) and 20-13-10: Any Employee Counts, and Interns Are Named
See your deadline days after startingEmployer means any person in the state who hires or employs any employee, with no threshold, plus any person elsewhere whose employee works partly or wholly in the state. Section 20-13-10 protects any person, employee, or intern, and interns include those who work without pay.
| Task | Description | Document | Days after starting |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDCL 20-13-35.1: The Election Ends the Agency's Jurisdiction | Upon receipt of notice of election, the Division of Human Rights and the Commission of Human Rights have no further jurisdiction over the parties concerning the charge. There is no route back to the administrative process. | - | See your deadline |
| SDCL 20-13-35.1: One Year to Sue, Running From the Notice of Election | Any civil action must be filed within one year of the election, and the limitation period begins on the date of the notice of election rather than on the date of the conduct. | - | See your deadline |
| SDCL 20-13-28.1: A No-Probable-Cause Dismissal Goes to Administrative Appeal | Where the Division determines there is no probable cause it issues an order dismissing the charge, which is final agency action for purposes of appeal under chapter 1-26. That is review on the agency record rather than a new lawsuit. | - | See your deadline |
| SDCL 20-13-1(7) and 20-13-10: Any Employee Counts, and Interns Are Named | Employer means any person in the state who hires or employs any employee, with no threshold, plus any person elsewhere whose employee works partly or wholly in the state. Section 20-13-10 protects any person, employee, or intern, and interns include those who work without pay. | - | See your deadline |
Frequently Asked Questions
Through a twenty day window that either side can use. SDCL 20-13-35.1 provides that no later than twenty days after the issuance of notice requiring the respondent to answer the charge, the charging party or the respondent may elect to have the claims asserted in the charge decided in a civil action, in lieu of a hearing. Your employer can make that election as easily as you can, so the choice of forum is not yours alone. The statute requires the SDCL 20-13-35 notice to include a statement informing the parties of the right to transfer the matter to circuit court, and requires the agency to notify the parties of the election and of the one year limitation period, but calendar the notice date yourself.
One year, running from the election rather than from the harassment. SDCL 20-13-35.1 provides that any civil action shall be filed within one year of the election, and that the limitation period in which to file a civil action begins on the date of the notice of election. The election is also permanent: upon receipt of notice of election, the Division of Human Rights or the Commission of Human Rights has no further jurisdiction over the parties concerning the charge filed. There is no route back to the administrative process once that notice goes in.
You are routed to an administrative appeal rather than to a trial. SDCL 20-13-28.1 provides that if the Division of Human Rights determines there is no probable cause, the division shall issue an order dismissing the charge, and that this is considered final agency action for purposes of appeal under chapter 1-26. That is review of what the agency decided on the record it built, not a new lawsuit, and because the Commission never issues the SDCL 20-13-35 notice in that situation, the election route to circuit court never opens. The deadline and procedure for that appeal sit in chapter 1-26, which is outside this guide, so take a dismissal order straight to a South Dakota employment lawyer.
South Dakota has one of the broadest employer definitions anywhere. SDCL 20-13-1(7) defines employer as any person within the State of South Dakota who hires or employs any employee, and any person wherever situated who hires or employs any employee whose services are to be partially or wholly performed in the state. There is no headcount threshold at all, no calendar week counting test, and no exclusion for domestic service, so a household with a single employee is within the definition on its face. Federal Title VII needs fifteen employees. The second limb also reaches a national employer with a single South Dakota remote worker.
Yes, by name. SDCL 20-13-10 makes it an unfair or discriminatory practice to accord adverse or unequal treatment to any person, employee, or intern with respect to any term or condition of employment, and SDCL 20-13-1(10) defines intern as a student or trainee who works, sometimes without pay, at an organization, industry, trade, or occupation in order to gain work experience or earn academic credit. That closes the gap that usually defeats an unpaid intern's claim, which is the argument that no compensation means no employee. Note the drafting is specific to the employer provision and the word intern was not added to the parallel sections on employment agencies and labor organizations.
Not under chapter 20-13. SDCL 20-13-10 lists race, color, creed, religion, sex, ancestry, disability, and national origin, and age, sexual orientation and gender identity do not appear as protected bases anywhere in that chapter or in the Division's rules. For sexual orientation and gender identity, protection reaches South Dakota workers through federal law and the federal reading of sex discrimination, which means the EEOC route. Age needs particular care, because the federal extension to 300 days for an age charge depends on there being a state law prohibiting age discrimination and an agency enforcing it. Treat an age claim as needing prompt federal action and confirm the deadline with the EEOC or a lawyer rather than assuming 300 days.
The word harassment does not appear in chapter 20-13 or in the Division's rules at all. A South Dakota harassment claim is built out of the language in SDCL 20-13-10 about according adverse or unequal treatment with respect to any term or condition of employment because of a protected basis, so describe what happened in those terms: what was said or done, when, who was present, and what changed about your work. The Division also publishes what it will not take, including personal appearance, political affiliation, lack of education and training, short term disabilities and personality conflicts. That last phrase is how a harassment complaint can get characterized on intake, so write the charge around the protected basis, not around the friction.
Other South Dakota guides
Ready to Draft Your Document?
Get AI-powered legal documents with attorney review included. Plans start at $39.99/mo.