Filing a Workplace Harassment Complaint in Wisconsin

Reviewed by DocDraft Legal Team - Wisconsin - Last updated September 15, 2026

Wisconsin is one of the few states where filing with the state agency is not a step toward a lawsuit but the entire case. The Wisconsin Fair Employment Act, Wis. Stat. 111.31 to 111.395, is enforced by the Equal Rights Division of the Department of Workforce Development, and Wis. Stat. 111.395 gives a court only the review of a commission order that ch. 227 allows, while providing that in an enforcement action the merits of a commission order are not subject to judicial review. Wisconsin courts have read the administrative remedy as the exclusive one for a violation of the act. At the same time the act reaches further down than federal law does: Wis. Stat. 111.32(6)(a) defines an employer as any person employing at least one individual, with no minimum headcount and no weeks-worked test, so a worker at a two person Wisconsin business can have a full state claim and no federal claim at all. If what you are dealing with involves assault, threats or stalking, contact emergency services and speak with an attorney, because those situations need more than a complaint form.

Find out where you stand in Wisconsin

Where are you with the harassment complaint?

DocDraft provides document preparation, not legal advice.

Can I sue my employer for workplace harassment in Wisconsin?

Not under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act itself. The act routes a harassment claim through the Equal Rights Division and then, on review, to the Labor and Industry Review Commission, and Wis. Stat. 111.395 gives a court only the review of a commission order that ch. 227 allows while providing that in an enforcement action the merits of a commission order are not subject to judicial review. Wisconsin courts have read the administrative remedy as the exclusive remedy for a violation of the act. That means a judge examines what the agency decided rather than hearing your case fresh, and there is no right to sue letter to ask for. Because this rests on how courts have read the act rather than on a single sentence in it, and because other bodies of law can sometimes supply a separate claim, it is worth asking a Wisconsin employment lawyer what is available on your particular facts before you conclude that no court option exists.

How long do I have to file a workplace harassment complaint in Wisconsin?

Wis. Stat. 111.39(1) allows the Equal Rights Division to receive and investigate a complaint only if it is filed no more than 300 days after the alleged discrimination occurred. The period runs from the date the conduct occurred. The statute contains no discovery rule and no language extending the period to the end of employment, so do not count from the day you were fired or the day you understood what had happened. Wisconsin authority on how the period is counted when harassment continues over months was not something this guide could confirm, so if your situation is ongoing, ask a Wisconsin employment lawyer how the period applies before relying on the most recent incident. Because Wisconsin has no court fallback, this deadline is worth treating as the hardest date in your case.

Do I have to file with a Wisconsin state agency before I can take a harassment claim anywhere else?

Under the Fair Employment Act there is nowhere else to take it. The complaint to the Equal Rights Division is not a precondition to a lawsuit in the way it is in Texas or Ohio; it is the proceeding itself. That is different from Michigan or Washington, where missing the agency deadline closes the agency door but leaves the courthouse open, and different again from New York, where filing with the state agency forecloses a lawsuit you could otherwise have brought. In Wisconsin the question of choosing between forums does not really arise for this claim. The separate decision worth making early is whether to also file a charge with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which is a different system with its own deadline.

Wisconsin reaches an employer with a single employee, but the complaint you file with the Equal Rights Division is the whole of your remedy rather than a step on the way to a lawsuit.

The Wisconsin Fair Employment Act does not give you a lawsuit. Wis. Stat. 111.395 provides that findings and orders of the Labor and Industry Review Commission are subject to review under ch. 227, and that in any enforcement action the merits of a commission order are not subject to judicial review, and Wisconsin courts have treated the administrative remedy as exclusive. A judge reviews what the agency decided rather than hearing your case over again. Because that conclusion rests on how courts have read the act rather than on a sentence in it, confirm your own options with a Wisconsin employment lawyer before assuming no court route exists.

Relevant Laws

Wis. Stat. 111.395 Judicial Review Limits Courts to Reviewing Orders

Findings and orders of the Labor and Industry Review Commission are subject to review under ch. 227, and in an enforcement action the merits of a commission order are not subject to judicial review. Wisconsin courts have read the administrative remedy as exclusive.

Wis. Stat. 111.32(6)(a) Covers an Employer With One Employee

An employer is the state, each state agency, and any other person engaging in any activity, enterprise or business employing at least one individual, with no weeks worked test. This reaches fifteen times lower than federal Title VII.

Wis. Stat. 111.321 Lists the Protected Bases

Age, race, creed, color, disability, marital status, sex, national origin, ancestry, arrest record, conviction record, military service, lawful product use off premises during nonworking hours, and declining to attend religious or political meetings.

Cite Wis. Stat. 111.36(1)(d) for a Sexual Orientation Claim

Sexual orientation is protected but does not appear in the 111.321 list, sitting separately at 111.36(1)(d). Gender identity does not appear in the chapter at all.

Wis. Stat. 111.3205 Excludes Most Franchisors

A franchisor is not the employer of a franchisee or of a franchisee's employees unless it agreed to that in writing or the department finds atypical control. A claimant at a franchised business generally cannot reach the brand.

Regional Variances

How Wisconsin differs

The 300 day deadline carries more weight in Wisconsin

The 300 day deadline carries more weight in Wisconsin than the same number does elsewhere. Wis. Stat. 111.39(1) allows the department to receive and investigate a complaint only if it is filed no more than 300 days after the alleged discrimination occurred. In a state with a court fallback, missing the agency deadline costs you the agency; in Wisconsin there is no second forum and no right to sue letter, so missing it can end the claim outright. Note the statute's framing: the 300 days is written as a limit on what the department may do, not as a duty on you.

Wisconsin reaches an employer with one employee. Wis. Stat.

Wisconsin reaches an employer with one employee. Wis. Stat. 111.32(6)(a) defines an employer as the state and each state agency and any other person engaging in any activity, enterprise or business employing at least one individual, with no calendar weeks qualifier of any kind. Federal Title VII needs 15 employees, so a worker at a small Wisconsin business can have a full state claim and no federal one. Three carve outs travel with that number: a social club or fraternal society as to a job advertised only within its membership, employment by your own parent, spouse or child, and a franchisor under Wis. Stat. 111.3205, which is not the employer of a franchisee's employees unless it agreed in writing or the department finds atypical control.

What you can recover is narrower than the coverage

What you can recover is narrower than the coverage suggests. The current chapter contains no section providing compensatory or punitive damages under the act, so an examiner's order is built around stopping the conduct and back pay rather than damages for what you went through. If your employer has 15 or more employees, a charge with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the route that can carry damages, and it runs on its own clock. That combination is the reason to look at both systems rather than assuming the state claim is the better one.

Suggested Compliance Checklist

Report to the Employer to Trigger Wis. Stat. 111.36(3)

See your deadline days after starting

The employer is presumed liable for sexual harassment occurring at the place of employment or while performing employment duties where the employee informed the employer and it failed to take appropriate action within a reasonable time. Record the date you reported.

Petition the Labor and Industry Review Commission Within 21 Days

See your deadline days after starting

Under Wis. Stat. 111.39(5) either party may petition for review of an examiner's order within 21 days of mailing. If no petition is filed the order becomes final.

Consider a Parallel EEOC Charge Where the Employer Has 15 or More Employees

See your deadline days after starting

The federal route is where damages are ordinarily available, since the current Wisconsin chapter provides none under the act. Confirm the federal deadline directly with the EEOC office covering Wisconsin.

Wis. Stat. 111.3205 Excludes Most Franchisors

See your deadline days after starting

A franchisor is not the employer of a franchisee or of a franchisee's employees unless it agreed to that in writing or the department finds atypical control. A claimant at a franchised business generally cannot reach the brand.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, and this is where Wisconsin is far stronger than federal law. Wis. Stat. 111.32(6)(a) defines an employer as the state and each state agency and any other person engaging in any activity, enterprise or business employing at least one individual. There is no minimum headcount and no requirement that the employer have employed anyone for a set number of calendar weeks. Federal Title VII does not apply below 15 employees, so a worker at a two or three person Wisconsin business can have a full state claim and no federal claim at all. Three limits travel with that: a social club or fraternal society is not an employer as to a job advertised only within its membership, an individual employed by a parent, spouse or child is not an employee under Wis. Stat. 111.32(5), and Wis. Stat. 111.3205 means a franchisor is generally not the employer of a franchisee's employees.

Less than the broad coverage might suggest, which is why the federal route matters even to Wisconsin workers who have a strong state claim. The current chapter contains no provision for compensatory or punitive damages under the act, so relief from a department examiner is built around ordering the conduct to stop and awarding back pay rather than compensating you for distress. If your employer has 15 or more employees, a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the route through which damages are ordinarily sought, and it runs on its own deadline alongside the state complaint. A Wisconsin employment lawyer can tell you what an order in your case would realistically contain before you decide which system to put your effort into.

It is worth considering seriously whenever your employer has 15 or more employees, because the federal system is where damages are ordinarily available and the state system is not. The two proceedings are separate, with separate deadlines, and a state complaint does not preserve a federal charge. Get the federal deadline directly from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission office covering Wisconsin rather than assuming a number, because the EEOC revises the periods it publishes without notice. If your employer has fewer than 15 employees, the federal route is generally closed to you and the state complaint is what you have, which makes the 300 day deadline all the more important.

Yes. Wis. Stat. 111.321 lists arrest record and conviction record as protected bases alongside age, race, creed, color, disability, marital status, sex, national origin, ancestry and military service. It also protects the use or nonuse of lawful products off the employer's premises during nonworking hours, and declining to attend a meeting or participate in a communication about religious or political matters. Those are real protections that most states do not offer. Two drafting points are worth knowing: sexual orientation is protected but does not appear in the 111.321 list, sitting instead at Wis. Stat. 111.36(1)(d), and gender identity does not appear anywhere in the chapter, so a claim on that basis should be discussed with a lawyer rather than assumed.

Wisconsin's definition does not require the conduct to be repeated, which is a meaningful difference from the federal approach that asks whether conduct was severe or pervasive. That does not mean every single incident will support a finding, but it does mean you should not talk yourself out of filing because something happened only once. Record the incident with the same care you would give a pattern: what was said or done, the date, where you were, whether you were performing work duties at the time, and who else was present. Location and work duties matter separately in Wisconsin because of how the employer liability presumption is written.

The division investigates and makes a probable cause determination, then attempts to resolve the matter by conference, conciliation or persuasion under Wis. Stat. 111.39(4)(b). If that does not resolve it, the division serves written notice of a hearing before a department examiner, which is set not less than 30 days after the notice is served, and the examiner issues written findings and an order. Either party may petition the Labor and Industry Review Commission to review that order within 21 days of mailing under Wis. Stat. 111.39(5), and if no petition is filed the examiner's order becomes final. The 21 day window is short and easy to miss, so calendar it as soon as an order arrives.

It depends on which part of the law you are relying on. The employer liability presumption at Wis. Stat. 111.36(3) is tied to location: it applies where the act occurs while the complaining employee is at the place of employment or performing duties relating to employment. That second limb does reach work away from the building, such as a conference, a client visit or a work call taken from home. Conduct outside those situations is not automatically lawful, it simply does not get the presumption and has to be proved the ordinary way. If the harassment you experienced happened largely through messages or social media, keep the records and raise the point specifically with a Wisconsin employment lawyer.

Ready to Draft Your Document?

Get AI-powered legal documents with attorney review included. Plans start at $39.99/mo.