Skip to content

Washington Non-Compete Agreement

Washington enforces employee non-competes above a 2026 wage threshold; a total ban voids all noncompete covenants June 30, 2027. Attorney review available.

Introduction

A non-compete agreement is a contract in which an employee agrees not to compete with a business after the job ends, and Washington lets one bind only a worker whose annualized earnings clear a six-figure inflation-adjusted threshold, $126,858.83 for 2026. In Washington a non-compete is enforceable, but only within tight statutory limits under RCW 49.62, and a big change is coming. As of 2026, an employee noncompetition covenant is void unless the worker's annualized earnings exceed an inflation-adjusted threshold set each year by the Department of Labor and Industries. For 2026 that figure is $126,858.83 for employees and $317,147.09 for independent contractors. Even above the threshold, the employer must have disclosed the terms in writing by the time the worker accepted the job (or provided independent consideration if the covenant was signed after employment began), the restraint must be reasonable in duration and geography, and a covenant longer than 18 months is presumed unreasonable and unenforceable. Enforcing a covenant against a laid-off worker requires paying that worker's base salary for the restricted period. The most important development is that a 2026 law (2026 c 149) makes all noncompetition covenants void and unenforceable in Washington beginning June 30, 2027, regardless of when they were signed. Nonsolicitation, confidentiality, and trade-secret covenants sit outside this chapter and stay available. This page explains Washington's current rule and offers a template scoped to those limits. It is a state-law overview, not a promise that any given covenant will hold up.

0/5000

Key Things to Know

  1. 1

    A non-compete agreement is a contract in which one party, usually an employee, agrees not to compete with a business for a set time and area after the relationship ends. In Washington it is enforceable only within the limits of RCW 49.62, and it becomes void statewide on June 30, 2027.

  2. 2

    Washington makes an employee noncompetition covenant void unless the worker's annualized earnings exceed the statutory threshold and the covenant meets the disclosure, consideration, and reasonableness rules of RCW 49.62.020. Below the threshold the covenant is unenforceable no matter how it is written.

  3. 3

    The earnings threshold is set by law and adjusted for inflation every year (RCW 49.62.040). For 2026 it is $126,858.83 for employees and $317,147.09 for independent contractors. Do not rely on any other state salary figure, and always confirm the current year's number with the Department of Labor and Industries.

  4. 4

    Even above the threshold, the restraint must be reasonable in duration and geographic scope and necessary to protect a legitimate business interest such as trade secrets. A court or arbitrator must presume any covenant longer than 18 months is unreasonable and unenforceable, rebuttable only by clear and convincing evidence (RCW 49.62.020(2)).

  5. 5

    The employer must disclose the covenant's terms in writing no later than the time the worker accepts the offer of employment. If the covenant is signed after employment begins, the employer must provide independent consideration, such as a raise or bonus; continued at-will employment alone is not enough. Enforcing against a laid-off worker requires paying that worker's base salary for the restricted period.

  6. 6

    Washington courts may reform or partially enforce an overbroad covenant, but RCW 49.62.080 still makes the party seeking enforcement pay the worker the greater of actual damages or a $5,000 statutory penalty plus attorneys' fees, which discourages overbroad drafting even where reformation is available.

  7. 7

    Nonsolicitation, confidentiality, and trade-secret or invention covenants are excluded from the noncompete chapter (RCW 49.62.010) and remain lawful even after the June 30, 2027 ban. Washington employers protect confidential information through these tools and the state Uniform Trade Secrets Act (RCW 19.108) rather than through a non-compete.

Key decisions before you file

Before you file a Non-Compete Agreement in Washington, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Non-Compete Agreement guide walks through them.

Open the Non-Compete Agreement guide

Customize your Non-Compete Agreement Template with DocDraft

Washington Requirements for Non-Compete Agreement

  • Enforceable Only Within RCW 49.62 Limits

    As of 2026 an employee noncompetition covenant is enforceable in Washington only if it meets RCW 49.62.020: the worker's annualized earnings exceed the statutory threshold, the terms were disclosed in writing by the time of acceptance, and the restraint is reasonable. Below the threshold or without disclosure the covenant is void, no matter how it is written.

  • 2026 Earnings Threshold

    Washington permits an employee non-compete only above an earnings threshold adjusted for inflation every year (RCW 49.62.040). For 2026 the figure is $126,858.83 for employees and $317,147.09 for independent contractors; the statutory base is $100,000 (RCW 49.62.020) and $250,000 (RCW 49.62.030). Do not use any other state salary figure, and confirm the current year's number with the Department of Labor and Industries.

  • Statewide Ban Effective June 30, 2027

    A 2026 law (2026 c 149) amends RCW 49.62.020 so that, beginning June 30, 2027, all noncompetition covenants are void and unenforceable in Washington regardless of when the parties entered into them. After that date even a covenant that met every requirement when signed cannot be enforced. Plan to rely on nonsolicitation, confidentiality, and trade-secret agreements instead.

  • Written Disclosure and Independent Consideration

    Under RCW 49.62.020 the employer must disclose the covenant's terms in writing no later than the time the worker accepts the offer of employment. If the covenant is signed after employment begins, the employer must provide independent consideration, such as a raise, bonus, or promotion; continued at-will employment alone is not enough. A covenant missing either requirement is void.

  • 18-Month Duration Presumption

    RCW 49.62.020(2) directs a court or arbitrator to presume that any noncompetition covenant lasting longer than 18 months after termination is unreasonable and unenforceable. The party seeking enforcement can rebut that presumption only by proving, with clear and convincing evidence, that a longer duration is necessary to protect its business or goodwill. Keep the duration to 18 months or less.

  • Layoff Compensation Requirement

    If the employer ends the worker's employment as the result of a layoff, RCW 49.62.020 makes the covenant unenforceable unless the employer pays compensation equal to the worker's base salary at the time of termination for the enforcement period, minus what the worker earns through later employment. A Washington employer must decide whether restricting a laid-off worker is worth the ongoing pay.

  • Reformation Carries a Penalty

    Washington courts may reform or partially enforce an overbroad covenant, but RCW 49.62.080 makes the party seeking enforcement pay the worker the greater of actual damages or a $5,000 statutory penalty, plus reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, when a court reforms a covenant or finds it violates the chapter. Draft narrowly, because overbreadth is penalized even when a court narrows the clause.

  • Use Nonsolicitation or Confidentiality Instead

    Nonsolicitation, confidentiality, and trade-secret or invention covenants are excluded from the noncompete chapter (RCW 49.62.010) and stay lawful even after the June 30, 2027 ban. Washington employers protect confidential information and customer relationships through these tools and the state Uniform Trade Secrets Act (RCW 19.108), which restrain misuse of information without restricting where a former worker may work.

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions are loading.