Washington Employee and Severance NDA
Draft a Washington employee or severance NDA under the Silenced No More Act (RCW 49.44.211), with carve-outs for any conduct the worker believes unlawful.
Introduction
A Washington employee NDA is a confidentiality agreement between a company and a worker that protects the employer's trade secrets and confidential business information. A severance NDA is the version signed at separation, usually inside a release agreement, and it often keeps the terms of the exit private. What separates it from a commercial NDA between two businesses is who signs it: a worker cannot be forced to stay silent about unlawful conduct. In Washington, the Silenced No More Act (RCW 49.44.211) is one of the broadest such laws. It voids any provision barring a worker from discussing conduct they reasonably believed was illegal discrimination, harassment, retaliation, a wage and hour violation, or sexual assault. In a settlement, only the employer's trade secrets and the settlement amount may stay confidential, not the underlying conduct. DocDraft drafts a Washington employee or severance NDA from your facts, with those carve-outs built in, and attorney review is available before anyone signs.
Key Things to Know
- 1
Washington's Silenced No More Act (RCW 49.44.211) is broad. It voids any NDA or non-disparagement provision covering conduct the employee reasonably believed was illegal discrimination, harassment, retaliation, a wage and hour violation, or sexual assault.
- 2
It expressly reaches wage and hour disputes. Washington is unusual in naming wage and hour violations alongside harassment and discrimination, so pay and overtime complaints cannot be silenced.
- 3
It covers both employment and settlement agreements. Onboarding NDAs and settlement or severance releases are each limited under the Act.
- 4
Only trade secrets and the settlement amount can stay confidential. In a settlement, the parties may keep the employer's trade secrets and the dollar figure private, but not the underlying conduct.
- 5
The worker's reasonable belief is the test. The conduct only needs to be something the employee reasonably believed was illegal under Washington, federal, or common law.
- 6
A violating clause is void and carries risk. Such a provision is void and unenforceable, and trying to enforce it can expose the employer to penalties under the Act.
- 7
The federal floor applies on top. The Speak Out Act and the non-waivable right to report to the EEOC, the NLRB, and the SEC still limit any Washington NDA.
Key decisions before you file
Before you file a Employee and Severance NDA in Washington, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Employee and Severance NDA guide walks through them.
Open the Employee and Severance NDA guideCustomize your Employee and Severance NDA Template with DocDraft
Washington Requirements for Employee and Severance NDA
Draft a Washington employee or severance NDA under the Silenced No More Act (RCW 49.44.211), with carve-outs for any conduct the worker believes unlawful.
Frequently Asked Questions
A Washington employee NDA is a contract in which a worker agrees to keep the employer's confidential information private, typically trade secrets, client and pricing data, internal processes, and other proprietary business information. It applies under Washington law and cannot prevent the worker from discussing conduct they reasonably believe was unlawful. The severance version of the same instrument is signed when the worker leaves.
An employee NDA is usually signed at hire to protect the company's confidential information. A severance NDA is signed at separation, generally inside a release agreement, in exchange for severance pay, and it often keeps the departure terms private. In Washington both are governed by the Silenced No More Act, and in a settlement the only permitted confidentiality is over the employer's trade secrets and the settlement amount, not the conduct at issue.
It is one of the broadest in the country. RCW 49.44.211 voids any agreement not to disclose or discuss conduct the employee reasonably believed was illegal discrimination, illegal harassment, illegal retaliation, a wage and hour violation, or sexual assault, or that is against a clear mandate of public policy. It is not limited to sexual harassment, and it applies to both employment and settlement agreements.
No. Under the Silenced No More Act, a settlement cannot bar the worker from disclosing or discussing the underlying conduct if the employee reasonably believed it was unlawful. The only things the parties may keep confidential are the employer's trade secrets and the amount paid in the settlement. The conduct itself stays open.
Yes, and that is one of the ways Washington goes further than most states. RCW 49.44.211 expressly lists a wage and hour violation among the conduct that cannot be locked behind an NDA or non-disparagement clause. So a Washington agreement cannot silence a worker's complaint about unpaid wages or overtime any more than it can silence a harassment complaint.
The protection turns on the employee's reasonable belief that the conduct was illegal discrimination, harassment, retaliation, a wage and hour violation, or sexual assault under Washington, federal, or common law. The worker does not have to prove the conduct was ultimately unlawful. A reasonable belief at the time is enough for the disclosure to be protected and for any gag on it to be void.
Yes. The Silenced No More Act limits confidentiality over unlawful conduct, not the protection of legitimate trade secrets. A Washington employee or severance NDA can still protect trade secrets, client and pricing data, and other genuine proprietary information, and it should include the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act immunity notice like any well-drafted NDA.
The offending provision is void and unenforceable. Beyond that, the Act attaches consequences to trying to enforce or even requesting such a provision, which can expose the employer to statutory damages and attorney fees. The rest of a properly drafted Washington NDA, including its trade-secret protections, generally remains in effect, so the safe path is to scope it correctly from the start.