Washington Living Will Requirements
Washington's statutory directive asks you to do something most states never separate out: check a distinct box for artificial nutrition and hydration, apart from your general instruction about life sustaining treatment.
Introduction
Washington's statutory directive asks you to do something most states never separate out: check a distinct box for artificial nutrition and hydration, apart from your general instruction about life sustaining treatment. Skip that second box and your general instruction alone will not tell your physician what you want done about a feeding tube or IV hydration. This document, which Washington's Natural Death Act (RCW 70.122) calls a directive, is your written statement of the medical treatment you want, or want withheld, once you can no longer speak for yourself. Washington keeps it entirely separate from naming someone to decide on your behalf, that job belongs to a durable power of attorney for health care under a different law, chapter 11.125 RCW, with its own signing rules. This guide covers the directive itself: what it lets you say, the two conditions that trigger it, and how Washington requires you to sign it.
Key Things to Know
- 1
Washington calls this document a directive, not a living will, and treats it as its own freestanding instrument under the Natural Death Act (RCW 70.122). It states what treatment you want or refuse, and those elections are binding on their own, with no agent named anywhere in it.
- 2
A living will is not a last will and testament. One covers medical care while you are alive but unable to communicate; the other covers who inherits your property after you die. Many people end up preparing both.
- 3
Your directive is complete and enforceable under RCW 70.122 whether or not you ever execute a health care power of attorney. Naming an agent is entirely optional and falls under a different chapter of law, chapter 11.125 RCW, with its own separate execution rule and witness list.
- 4
The directive recognizes only two conditions that can trigger it: a terminal condition, diagnosed by your attending physician, or a permanent unconsciousness condition, which needs a diagnosis from two physicians.
- 5
Artificial nutrition and hydration gets its own separate checkbox on Washington's form, apart from your general treatment instruction. Leaving it blank leaves your wishes on that specific point unstated.
- 6
Nothing in Washington's Natural Death Act changes, pauses, or cancels your directive because you are pregnant. The chapter contains no such clause at all.
- 7
You can sign before a notary public, or before two qualifying witnesses instead. Both are equally valid ways to execute the directive; neither is a fallback for the other.
- 8
Washington does not require an extra advocate or ombudsman witness for residents of skilled nursing or long term care facilities, a requirement some other states do impose.
- 9
You can revoke the directive at any time, no matter your mental state, by destroying it, telling your physician, writing a signed revocation, or, if it is stored in Washington's registry, revoking it online through the Department of Health.
Key decisions before you file
Before you file a Living Will in Washington, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Living Will guide walks through them.
Open the Living Will guideCustomize your Living Will Template with DocDraft
Washington Requirements for Living Will
Washington's statute calls this document a directive, created under the Natural Death Act. The directive is a written, signed statement of your wishes about withholding or withdrawing life sustaining treatment if you are later diagnosed with a terminal condition or a permanent unconscious condition. The phrase living will does not appear in the statute itself; it is a common nickname, not the statutory term.
Only an adult person may execute a directive, meaning someone who has reached the age of majority, 18, under RCW 26.28.010 and 26.28.015, and who has the capacity to make health care decisions.
A terminal condition must be diagnosed in writing by your single attending physician, not multiple physicians. It is defined as an incurable and irreversible condition that will, within reasonable medical judgment, cause death within a reasonable period, where life sustaining treatment would only prolong the process of dying.
Washington's second and only other trigger condition is a permanent unconscious condition, defined as an incurable, irreversible state with no reasonable probability of recovery from an irreversible coma or a persistent vegetative state. Unlike the terminal condition trigger, this diagnosis takes two physicians, one of whom must be your attending physician, both of whom must personally examine you.
Washington defines life sustaining treatment broadly as any medical or surgical intervention using mechanical or other artificial means, including artificially provided nutrition and hydration, to sustain, restore, or replace a vital function that would otherwise only prolong dying. The statute does not itemize specific modalities like ventilation, dialysis, or antibiotics by name, and expressly excludes medication or intervention given solely to relieve pain.
If you use witnesses instead of a notary, Washington requires two witnesses who are not related to you by blood or marriage, not entitled to any portion of your estate, not your attending physician, not an employee of your attending physician or of the health facility where you are a patient, and not anyone with a claim against your estate.
Acknowledging your directive before a notary public or other official authorized to take acknowledgments is not just an extra verification step, it is a fully independent, equally valid way to execute the directive, standing on equal footing with signing before two witnesses. You need one or the other, not both.
You may revoke your directive at any time, regardless of your mental state, by destroying it, by a signed and dated written revocation, or by telling your attending physician. If your directive is stored in Washington's health care declarations registry, you may also revoke it through an online method the Department of Health establishes.
A physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or health facility that participates in good faith in withholding or withdrawing life sustaining treatment consistent with your directive is immune from civil, criminal, and professional discipline liability, unless otherwise negligent.
Washington's Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, chapter 68.64 RCW, lets you make, amend, or revoke an anatomical gift.
Under RCW 70.122.030(3), a directive executed in another jurisdiction is valid in Washington to the extent allowed by state law and federal constitutional law.
Chapter 71.32 RCW governs Washington's voluntary mental health advance directives, which are distinct from the directive under RCW 70.122 and from involuntary commitment proceedings. It is its own document with its own execution and witness rules, not a section of the RCW 70.122 directive covered on this page, so completing this page's directive alone does not give you mental health advance directive coverage.
A durable power of attorney for health care, authorized under chapter 11.125 RCW, lets you name an agent with authority over health care decisions, including HIPAA access and informed consent. That is a separate function from the treatment wishes directive covered on this page. For agent designation guidance specifically, see Washington Healthcare Power of Attorney.
Federal law requires Medicare and Medicaid participating hospitals, nursing homes, and other facilities to inform patients in writing of their right under Washington law to make an advance directive, including stating their own treatment wishes.
The directive, or a copy, must be made part of the patient's medical records. The records custodian must also forward a copy to the health facility when withholding or withdrawal of treatment is being considered.
Washington's statutory directive form requires a second, separately initialed choice for artificial nutrition and hydration, apart from the general life sustaining treatment instruction. Marking the general instruction alone does not state your wishes on nutrition and hydration specifically.
Washington does not combine the treatment wishes directive with agent designation into one instrument. The directive (chapter 70.122 RCW) and the durable power of attorney for health care (chapter 11.125 RCW) are governed by different statutes with different execution rules.
Washington's legislative findings state that physicians and nurses should not withhold or unreasonably diminish pain medication for a patient in a terminal condition where the medication's primary purpose is comfort, and the statutory definition of life sustaining treatment expressly excludes medication or intervention given solely to relieve pain.
Frequently Asked Questions
In Washington, a living will is what state law calls a directive, created under the Natural Death Act (RCW 70.122). It lets you tell your attending physician, in writing, whether you want life sustaining treatment withheld or withdrawn if you are later diagnosed with a terminal condition or a permanent unconscious condition, and separately whether you want artificial nutrition and hydration continued. The phrase living will never appears in the statute itself; it is simply the common name people use for this directive.
Washington keeps these as two entirely separate documents governed by two different laws. The living will, the directive under RCW 70.122, states your own treatment wishes directly and needs no agent at all. A health care power of attorney, a different document created under chapter 11.125 RCW, is the one that names a decision maker instead. You can sign one without the other, and each has its own execution requirements. See Washington Healthcare Power of Attorney for that separate document.
They govern different things at different times. A Washington living will, the RCW 70.122 directive, controls medical treatment while you are alive but unable to communicate. A last will and testament controls who receives your property after you die, and only takes effect at death. Neither one substitutes for the other. If you're planning end of life medical care with a directive, consider a separate Washington Last Will and Testament for your estate.
Yes. RCW 70.122.030's statutory directive form gives artificial nutrition and hydration its own initialed choice, item (c), apart from the general withhold or withdraw instruction in item (a). Checking or initialing (a) alone does not answer the artificial nutrition and hydration question; you have to mark (c) separately to say whether you want it continued or not.
No. No. Washington's Natural Death Act (chapter 70.122 RCW) does not contain a pregnancy clause. Unlike some states, Washington law does not pause, void, or modify a directive if the person who signed it is pregnant.
Not necessarily. RCW 70.122.030 lets you choose between two equally valid signing routes: acknowledgment before a notary public, or signing in front of two qualifying witnesses. Picking the witness route doesn't make your directive weaker, and picking notarization isn't required just because witnesses are harder to arrange.
No. Some states add a special ombudsman or patient advocate witness requirement for residents of skilled nursing facilities. RCW 70.122.030 has no such rule for Washington; the only facility related restriction is that an employee of the health facility where you're a patient cannot serve as one of your two witnesses.
No. The Washington Department of Health runs a voluntary health care declarations registry under RCW 70.122.130 where providers can look up your directive on request, and the statute says plainly that skipping registration doesn't affect validity. Your directive works as soon as it's properly signed, whether or not you ever register it.
Yes. RCW 70.122.030(3) says a directive executed in another political jurisdiction is valid here to the extent Washington law and federal constitutional law allow. A Washington provider can rely on an out of state directive on that basis.