Arizona Independent Contractor Agreement Template

Arizona puts the contractor paperwork into the statute itself, and then says in terms that the two documents it prescribes cannot stand in for each other.

Find out where you stand in Arizona

What do you need the contractor agreement for?

DocDraft provides document preparation, not legal advice.

Introduction

An Independent Contractor Agreement is a contract between a business and a self-employed worker covering scope, payment, ownership of the work product, and how the engagement ends. Arizona is one of the very few states that drafts the classification paperwork itself. A.R.S. 23-1601 sets out a Declaration of Independent Business Status, a form the declaration must substantially comply with, built from six numbered acknowledgments whose fifth item asks the contractor to acknowledge at least six of ten enumerated conditions. Executing the declaration and then acting in a manner substantially consistent with it creates a rebuttable presumption of an independent contractor relationship for purposes of Title 23. Separately, A.R.S. 23-902(D) prescribes a workers compensation written agreement that has to be dated, signed by both parties, carry a disclosure that the contractor is not entitled to workers compensation benefits from the business, and recite eight specific facts about how the business does not treat the contractor. That one earns its own rebuttable presumption and, while it stands, bars the carrier from collecting premium on payments to the contractor. The point that catches businesses out is A.R.S. 23-1601(E), which provides that the declaration does not operate to the same effect as, and does not substitute for, the workers compensation agreement. Two documents, two jobs. And neither reaches Arizona minimum wage claims, where the burden runs the other way.

Key Things to Know

  1. 1

    Arizona is not an ABC state for unemployment insurance. A.R.S. 23-613.01(A) defines an employee as an individual subject to the direction, rule, or control of the employing unit as to both the method of performing the services and the result to be accomplished, and lists indications of control including hours of work, location of work, the right to perform services for others, tools, equipment, materials, expenses, and the use of other workers. There is no statutory presumption of employment by default.

  2. 2

    The Declaration of Independent Business Status is optional and asymmetric. A.R.S. 23-1601(A) and (D) make execution voluntary, and a failure to execute one creates no adverse presumption. What it buys, under 23-1601(B), is that where the contractor executes a compliant declaration and the employing unit acts in a manner substantially consistent with it, a rebuttable presumption of an independent contractor relationship arises for the purposes of Title 23.

  3. 3

    The declaration has a prescribed shape. It must substantially comply with the statutory form, be signed by the independent contractor, and be dated. It contains six numbered acknowledgments, and the fifth requires the contractor to acknowledge at least six of ten enumerated conditions. Because substantial compliance is the standard, the safer practice is to reproduce the statutory language rather than to summarize it. A.R.S. 23-1601(C) carves out employing units licensed or required to be licensed under Title 32, chapter 10.

  4. 4

    Workers compensation needs its own document, and it is a different document. A.R.S. 23-902(D) requires a written agreement that is dated, signed by both parties, and contains a disclosure statement that the independent contractor is not entitled to workers compensation benefits from the business, together with eight affirmative statements about exclusivity, licenses and registrations, salary or hourly pay, termination, tools, time of performance, the payee name, and keeping business operations separate.

  5. 5

    The workers compensation agreement has a cash consequence. Where a fully completed agreement satisfying A.R.S. 23-902(D) is submitted to the carrier, no premium may be collected on payments by the business to the independent contractor unless the rebuttable presumption is overcome. Submission to the carrier is part of the mechanism, so an executed agreement sitting in a personnel file does not produce the premium result.

  6. 6

    A.R.S. 23-1601(E) forbids substituting one document for the other. The declaration does not operate to the same effect as, or otherwise act as a substitute for, a written agreement executed under A.R.S. 23-902(D). A business that wants the general Title 23 presumption and the workers compensation premium relief has to execute two separate instruments, and A.R.S. 23-902(F) voids the workers compensation agreement entirely where consent was obtained by misrepresentation, false statements, fraud, intimidation, coercion, or duress.

  7. 7

    Minimum wage runs the other way and is the trap on this page. A.R.S. 23-362(D) provides that whether a person is an independent contractor or an employee is determined according to Fair Labor Standards Act standards, but that the burden of proof is on the party for whom the work is performed to show independent contractor status by clear and convincing evidence. That definition came from a voter initiative and is protected from ordinary legislative amendment, so a declaration executed under a later statute should not be assumed to answer a minimum wage claim.

Key decisions before you file

Before you file a Independent Contractor Agreement in Arizona, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Independent Contractor Agreement guide walks through them.

Open the Independent Contractor Agreement guide

Customize your Independent Contractor Agreement Template with DocDraft

Arizona Independent Contractor Agreement (Compact State Terms)

Arizona writes two separate documents into statute and forbids using either in place of the other. Use the national Independent Contractor Agreement for the commercial terms, then execute the Arizona instruments below alongside it. Neither is compulsory, and A.R.S. 23-1601(D) provides that a failure to execute a declaration creates no adverse presumption.

1. Declaration of Independent Business Status (A.R.S. 23-1601(A), (B)). The declaration is signed and dated by the Contractor and must substantially comply with the statutory form, which sets out six numbered acknowledgments. The fifth requires the Contractor to acknowledge at least six of the ten conditions the statute enumerates. Executing it, and then acting in a manner substantially consistent with it, creates a rebuttable presumption of an independent contractor relationship for purposes of Title 23. Reproduce the statutory wording; substantial compliance is the standard. The route is not available to an employing unit licensed or required to be licensed under Title 32, chapter 10.

2. Workers compensation written agreement (A.R.S. 23-902(D)). A separate document, dated and signed by both parties, containing a disclosure statement that the Contractor is not entitled to workers compensation benefits from the Company, and stating that the Company: (a) does not require the Contractor to perform work exclusively for the Company; (b) does not provide the Contractor with any business registrations or licenses required to perform the specific services set out in the contract; (c) does not pay a salary or hourly rate instead of an amount fixed by contract; (d) will not terminate the Contractor before the expiration of the contract period unless the Contractor breaches the contract or violates the laws of this state; (e) does not provide tools to the Contractor; (f) does not dictate the time of performance; (g) pays the Contractor in the name appearing on the written agreement; and (h) will not combine business operations with the Contractor, but maintains those operations separately.

3. Premium effect (A.R.S. 23-902(D)). Unless the presumption is overcome, no premium may be collected by the carrier on payments by the Company to the Contractor where a fully completed agreement satisfying the subsection is submitted to the carrier. Send it to the carrier; filing it away does nothing.

4. The two documents are not interchangeable (A.R.S. 23-1601(E)). A declaration of independent business status does not operate to the same effect as, and does not act as a substitute for, a written agreement executed under A.R.S. 23-902(D). A business that wants the Title 23 presumption and the workers compensation premium relief executes both.

5. Consent (A.R.S. 23-902(F)). The written agreement is null and void and creates no presumption if the consent of either party was obtained through misrepresentation, false statements, fraud, intimidation, coercion, or duress.

6. Minimum wage is a separate question (A.R.S. 23-362(D)). Contractor status for minimum wage purposes is determined according to Fair Labor Standards Act standards, with the burden on the party for whom the work is performed to show it by clear and convincing evidence. Neither document above should be treated as answering a minimum wage claim.

This Arizona clause set is general information, not legal advice; attorney review is available.

Arizona Requirements for Independent Contractor Agreement

Arizona Declaration of Independent Business Status (A.R.S. 23-1601(A), (B))

An employing unit may prove the existence of an independent contractor relationship for purposes of Title 23 by having the independent contractor execute a declaration of independent business status and by acting in a manner substantially consistent with the declaration. Compliance creates a rebuttable presumption of an independent contractor relationship. The declaration must substantially comply with the statutory form, must be signed by the independent contractor, and must be dated.

Arizona Six of Ten Acknowledgment Inside the Declaration (A.R.S. 23-1601)

The statutory declaration is built from six numbered acknowledgments. The fifth requires the independent contractor to acknowledge at least six of the ten conditions the section enumerates. Because the statute demands substantial compliance with the form it sets out, the declaration should reproduce the statutory wording rather than summarize it, and the conditions acknowledged should be ones the engagement actually satisfies in practice.

Arizona Declaration Is Optional and No Adverse Inference Follows (A.R.S. 23-1601(A), (C), (D))

Execution of a declaration is expressly optional and a failure to execute one creates no adverse presumption. The section does not apply to an employing unit that is licensed or required to be licensed under Title 32, chapter 10, so businesses in that licensed category cannot use the declaration route and must rely on the ordinary statutory tests.

Arizona Workers Compensation Written Agreement Contents (A.R.S. 23-902(D))

The agreement must be dated, signed by both parties, and contain a disclosure statement that the independent contractor is not entitled to workers compensation benefits from the business. It must also state that the business does not require exclusive work, does not provide required business registrations or licenses, does not pay a salary or hourly rate instead of a contract amount, will not terminate before the contract period expires absent breach or a violation of state law, does not provide tools, does not dictate the time of performance, pays in the name on the agreement, and will not combine business operations with the contractor.

Arizona Premium Bar on Submission to the Carrier (A.R.S. 23-902(D))

Unless the rebuttable presumption is overcome, no premium may be collected by the carrier on payments by the business to the independent contractor where a fully completed written agreement satisfying the subsection is submitted to the carrier. The premium consequence depends on submission, so the executed agreement has to be delivered to the carrier rather than simply retained by the business.

Arizona Prohibition on Substituting One Document for the Other (A.R.S. 23-1601(E))

A declaration of independent business status does not operate to the same effect as, or otherwise act as a substitute for, a written agreement executed pursuant to A.R.S. 23-902(D). A business seeking both the Title 23 presumption and the workers compensation premium relief must execute two separate instruments, each satisfying its own statutory requirements.

Arizona Voiding for Defective Consent (A.R.S. 23-902(F))

A written agreement executed in compliance with A.R.S. 23-902(D) is null and void and creates no presumption of an independent contractor relationship if the consent of either party was obtained through misrepresentation, false statements, fraud or intimidation, or through coercion or duress. The presumption therefore depends on how the document was presented and signed, not only on what it contains.

Arizona Minimum Wage Clear and Convincing Burden (A.R.S. 23-362(D))

For minimum wage purposes, whether a person is an independent contractor or an employee is determined according to the standards of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, but the burden of proof is on the party for whom the work is performed to show independent contractor status by clear and convincing evidence. This definition was adopted by voter initiative and is protected against ordinary legislative amendment, so it should not be treated as displaced by the later declaration statute.

Arizona Unemployment Insurance Control Definition (A.R.S. 23-613.01(A))

An employee is an individual who performs services for an employing unit and who is subject to the direction, rule, or control of the employing unit as to both the method of performing the services and the result to be accomplished. Indications of control include controlling hours of work, location of work, the right to perform services for others, tools, equipment, materials, expenses, and the use of other workers. Individuals performing services as an independent contractor, business person, agent, or consultant are excluded.

Arizona Part or Process Rule for Workers Compensation (A.R.S. 23-902(B), (C))

Where an employer procures work to be done by a contractor over whose work the employer retains supervision or control, and the work is a part or process in the trade or business of the employer, the contractor and the contractor employees and any subcontractor and its employees are employees of the original employer. An independent contractor is a person independent of the business in the execution of the work, not subject to its rule or control, engaged only in a definite job or piece of work, and subordinate only in effecting a result in accordance with the business design.

Frequently Asked Questions

Arizona is one of the few states that puts the paperwork in the statute. A.R.S. 23-1601 prescribes a Declaration of Independent Business Status, and A.R.S. 23-902(D) prescribes a separate workers compensation written agreement with eight required recitals and a benefits disclosure. Each earns its own rebuttable presumption, and A.R.S. 23-1601(E) says the declaration cannot stand in for the workers compensation agreement.

No. A.R.S. 23-1601(A) makes execution optional, and subsection (D) provides that a failure to execute a declaration creates no adverse presumption against the parties. It is a tool for obtaining a rebuttable presumption of contractor status across Title 23, available to a business that also acts in a manner substantially consistent with what the declaration says. Employing units licensed or required to be licensed under Title 32, chapter 10 are outside the provision.

The declaration must substantially comply with the statutory form, be signed by the independent contractor, and be dated. The form is built from six numbered acknowledgments, and the fifth of them requires the contractor to acknowledge at least six of ten conditions the statute enumerates. Because the standard is substantial compliance with a form the legislature wrote out, reproducing the statutory language is safer than paraphrasing it.

No, and this is the point businesses most often miss. A.R.S. 23-1601(E) provides that a declaration does not operate to the same effect as, or otherwise act as a substitute for, a written agreement executed under A.R.S. 23-902(D). The workers compensation route needs its own dated document, signed by both parties, containing a disclosure that the contractor is not entitled to workers compensation benefits from the business plus the eight statements the subsection lists.

That the business does not require the contractor to work exclusively for it; does not provide business registrations or licenses required for the specific services; does not pay a salary or hourly rate instead of an amount fixed by contract; will not terminate before the contract period expires unless the contractor breaches the contract or violates state law; does not provide tools; does not dictate the time of performance; pays the contractor in the name appearing on the written agreement; and will not combine business operations with the contractor but maintains them separately.

It can. A.R.S. 23-902(D) provides that unless the rebuttable presumption is overcome, no premium may be collected by the carrier on payments by the business to the independent contractor where a fully completed written agreement satisfying the subsection is submitted to the carrier. Submission is part of the mechanism, so the agreement has to actually reach the carrier. The presumption remains rebuttable, so a relationship that operates as employment can still be reclassified.

It should not be relied on for that. A.R.S. 23-362(D) determines independent contractor status for minimum wage purposes according to Fair Labor Standards Act standards and puts the burden of proof on the party for whom the work is performed to show contractor status by clear and convincing evidence. That definition was enacted by voter initiative and is constrained against ordinary legislative amendment, which leaves genuine legal tension with a presumption created by later legislation. Attorney review is an option where a wage claim is in play.

Yes. A.R.S. 23-902(F) provides that a written agreement executed under subsection (D) is null and void and creates no presumption of an independent contractor relationship if the consent of either party was obtained through misrepresentation, false statements, fraud or intimidation, or through coercion or duress. Presenting the document as a condition of getting paid, or on a take it or leave it basis at the moment of hire, is the kind of fact pattern that invites that argument.

Through the statutory definitions. A.R.S. 23-902(B) provides that where an employer procures work from a contractor over whose work the employer retains supervision or control, and the work is a part or process in the trade or business of the employer, the contractor and the contractor employees are employees of the original employer. A.R.S. 23-902(C) defines an independent contractor as a person independent in the execution of the work, not subject to the rule or control of the business, engaged only in a definite job, and subordinate only in effecting a result in accordance with the business design.