Wyoming Independent Contractor Agreement Template
Wyoming repealed the usual ABC prongs and rebuilt the test around a right of substitution, which is why a routine backup coverage clause can end contractor status by itself.
Find out where you stand in Wyoming
What do you need the contractor agreement for?
DocDraft provides document preparation, not legal advice.
Introduction
An Independent Contractor Agreement is a contract between a business and a self-employed worker covering scope, payment, ownership of the work product, and how the engagement ends. Wyoming requires no particular form for one, but it built a classification test that punishes a specific and very common drafting habit. Where most states ask whether the work falls outside the hiring party's usual course of business and whether the worker runs an independently established trade, Wyoming repealed both of those prongs, in 1991 and 1995, and replaced them with two others: the worker must represent his services to the public as a self-employed individual or independent contractor, and the worker must be able to substitute another individual to perform the services. That second element has no real counterpart in most state codes, and the Wyoming Supreme Court has read it strictly. The same three element test governs both unemployment insurance and workers' compensation. Wage and hour is a genuine gap: no Wyoming statute, regulation, agency publication, or Supreme Court decision sets a classification test for the state minimum wage act, and the agency's published test is expressly framed as one for unemployment insurance and workers' compensation.
Key Things to Know
- 1
Wyoming dismantled the standard ABC test and left the numbering behind as evidence. Wyo. Stat. 27-3-104(b) still shows subdivisions (ii), (iii), and (iv) as repealed, by session laws of 1991 and 1995. What remains is a three element test: the individual is free from control or direction over the details of the performance of services by contract and by fact, represents his services to the public as a self-employed individual or an independent contractor, and may substitute another individual to perform his services.
- 2
The substitution element is the unusual one and the easiest to lose. Very few states make a right to substitute a required condition of contractor status. In Circle C Resources v. Kobielusz, 2014 WY 35, the Wyoming Supreme Court held that the element requires the worker to have the ability to select his or her substitute, following the reasoning in Rustler Lodge v. Industrial Commission. An arrangement in which the hiring party organizes backup or replacement coverage defeats the element even where the worker is otherwise plainly in business.
- 3
All the elements are conjunctive, so one failure decides the case. Kobielusz holds that Wyo. Stat. 27-14-102(a)(xxiii) establishes a three part test, each element of which must be satisfied in order for an individual to qualify as an independent contractor. That is why the substitution point matters so much: strength on control and on holding out cannot compensate for a contract that hands backup coverage to the hiring party.
- 4
The control element imports the familiar common law factors. Kobielusz holds that there is nothing in the statute precluding consideration of factors such as the method of payment, the right to terminate the relationship without liability, and the furnishing of tools and equipment, so those are weighed inside the control element. The element also has to hold both by contract and by fact, which means a contract that reserves control defeats it regardless of practice.
- 5
The same three elements cover both unemployment insurance and workers' compensation. Wyo. Stat. 27-14-102(a)(xxiii) defines independent contractor for workers' compensation in the same terms as Wyo. Stat. 27-3-104(b) does for unemployment insurance, with subparagraph (B) repealed in 1998, and the Wyoming Department of Workforce Services publishes a single three condition test for both. It also notes that determinations are made by the division based on the actual working conditions.
- 6
Portable benefit contributions are now off the classification table, and one clause has a format rule. Wyo. Stat. 27-1-117, in effect since July 1, 2026, provides that contributions to a portable benefit account may not be used as a factor in determining classification. Where contributions are funded by withholding from the contractor's pay, the contractor must expressly agree to the withholding in writing and the written agreement must be clear, unambiguous, and prominently displayed in a work contract or separate agreement.
- 7
Wage and hour is an open question rather than a lenient one. The Wyoming minimum wage act at Wyo. Stat. 27-4-201(a) defines employ as to suffer or to permit to work and employee as any individual employed by an employer, subject to eight enumerated exclusions, but neither the statute nor the enforcing division publishes an employee or contractor test. The Department of Workforce Services test is expressly framed as being for unemployment insurance and workers' compensation purposes. Because the state minimum wage remains $5.15 an hour under Wyo. Stat. 27-4-202(a), most wage exposure in Wyoming runs through the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and its economic realities analysis instead.
Key decisions before you file
Before you file a Independent Contractor Agreement in Wyoming, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Independent Contractor Agreement guide walks through them.
Open the Independent Contractor Agreement guideCustomize your Independent Contractor Agreement Template with DocDraft
Wyoming Requirements for Independent Contractor Agreement
An individual who performs service for wages is an employee unless it is shown that the individual is free from control or direction over the details of the performance of services by contract and by fact, represents his services to the public as a self-employed individual or an independent contractor, and may substitute another individual to perform his services. Subdivisions (ii), (iii), and (iv) were repealed by session laws of 1991 and 1995, which is why the usual outside the usual course and independently established trade prongs are absent.
Independent contractor means an individual who performs services for another individual or entity and is free from control or direction over the details of the performance of services by contract and by fact, represents his services to the public as a self-employed individual or an independent contractor, and may substitute another person to perform his services. Subparagraph (B) was repealed in 1998. The Wyoming Department of Workforce Services publishes a single three condition test covering both unemployment insurance and workers' compensation.
In Circle C Resources v. Kobielusz, 2014 WY 35, the Wyoming Supreme Court held that the substitution element requires the worker to have the ability to select his or her substitute, following Rustler Lodge v. Industrial Commission. A contract under which the hiring party designates or arranges backup or replacement coverage defeats the element. Draft the substitution right so that the contractor selects the substitute and bears responsibility for that person's work.
Kobielusz holds that Wyo. Stat. 27-14-102(a)(xxiii) establishes a three part test, each element of which must be satisfied in order for an individual to qualify as an independent contractor. A single failed element ends the inquiry regardless of the strength of the remaining ones, so the analysis should be run element by element rather than as an overall impression of independence.
Kobielusz holds that nothing in the statute precludes consideration of common law factors within the control element, expressly naming the method of payment, the right to terminate the relationship without liability, and the furnishing of tools and equipment. Because the element must be satisfied by contract and by fact, a clause that reserves broad direction over the details of performance can defeat it even where the hiring party never exercises that authority.
Effective July 1, 2026, contributions to a portable benefit account for an independent contractor may not be used as a factor in determining that person's classification. This removes a disincentive that previously discouraged hiring parties from offering benefit contributions to contractors, and it means such contributions can be documented in the agreement without weakening the contractor position.
Where contributions to a portable benefit account are funded by withholding from the contractor's compensation, the withholding must be expressly agreed to by the independent contractor in writing, and the written agreement for withholding funds or contributing employer funds must be clear, unambiguous, and prominently displayed in a work contract or separate agreement. Place the term in its own headed section rather than inside general boilerplate.
A leased owner-operator is outside the workers' compensation definition of employee only where the service is performed pursuant to a contract providing that the owner-operator shall not be treated as an employee for purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, the Social Security Act, the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, and income tax withholding at source. The exclusion fails without that contract language, so it must be drafted in rather than assumed.
Neither a franchisee nor a franchisee's employee is deemed to be an employee of the franchisor for any purpose under the title unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the franchisor and the franchisee. The default therefore protects the franchisor, and a written assumption of the employer role is what reverses it, which makes franchise documentation worth reviewing alongside the contractor agreements themselves.
The minimum wage act defines employ as to suffer or to permit to work and employee as any individual employed by an employer, subject to eight enumerated exclusions, but neither it nor the enforcing division sets an employee or contractor test, and the Department of Workforce Services three condition test is framed as applying to unemployment insurance and workers' compensation. The state minimum wage remains $5.15 an hour, so most wage exposure runs through the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and its economic realities analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions
Wyoming makes a right of substitution an element of independent contractor status. Under Wyo. Stat. 27-3-104(b) and Wyo. Stat. 27-14-102(a)(xxiii) the worker must be free from control over the details of performance, must hold his services out to the public as self-employed, and must be able to substitute another individual to perform the services. Most templates say nothing about substitution, or worse, promise that the hiring party will arrange cover, which is exactly what the element cannot tolerate.
Not the standard one. The usual second and third prongs, service outside the usual course of the hiring party's business and an independently established trade, were repealed in 1991 and 1995 and replaced with a holding out prong and a right to substitute prong. The published code still shows the repealed subdivisions in place, which is a useful reminder that Wyoming deliberately rebuilt the test rather than never having adopted one.
Because it takes the substitution decision away from the worker. In Circle C Resources v. Kobielusz, 2014 WY 35, the Wyoming Supreme Court held that the substitution element requires the worker to have the ability to select his or her substitute. Where the hiring party arranges who covers the work, that ability is absent and the element fails. Since the elements are conjunctive, that single failure defeats contractor status even if control and holding out are both clearly satisfied.
Yes. Wyo. Stat. 27-14-102(a)(xxiii) defines independent contractor for workers' compensation purposes in the same three terms used in the unemployment statute, and the Wyoming Department of Workforce Services publishes one three condition test covering both. The department also notes that determinations are made by the division based on the actual working conditions, so the agreement is a starting point rather than the answer.
There is no settled state answer, and that is worth knowing rather than guessing at. The Wyoming minimum wage act defines employ as to suffer or to permit to work and employee as any individual employed by an employer with eight listed exclusions, but sets no classification test, and the Labor Standards Division does not publish one. The Department of Workforce Services three condition test is framed as applying to unemployment insurance and workers' compensation. Because the state minimum wage is $5.15 an hour, most wage exposure in practice runs through the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.
Those factors sit inside the control element. Kobielusz holds that there is nothing in the statute precluding consideration of common law factors such as the method of payment, the right to terminate the relationship without liability, and the furnishing of tools and equipment. So paying a flat project fee, avoiding an at will termination right that behaves like employment, and having the contractor supply the tools all help on element one, but none of them substitutes for the holding out or substitution elements.
Wyo. Stat. 27-1-117, in effect since July 1, 2026, provides that contributions to a portable benefit account for an independent contractor may not be used as a factor in determining that person's classification. It also sets a drafting rule: where a contribution is funded by withholding from the contractor's compensation, the contractor must expressly agree to the withholding in writing and the written agreement must be clear, unambiguous, and prominently displayed in a work contract or a separate agreement. Burying it in boilerplate does not meet that standard.
Both have their own rules. A leased owner-operator is excluded from the workers' compensation definition of employee under Wyo. Stat. 27-14-102(a)(vii)(O) only where the service is performed pursuant to a contract providing that the owner-operator will not be treated as an employee for purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, the Social Security Act, the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, and income tax withholding at source. Under Wyo. Stat. 27-1-116(a) a franchisee and a franchisee's employees are not employees of the franchisor for any purpose under the title unless otherwise agreed to in writing.
Yes. Kobielusz reaffirms the long standing Wyoming rule from Burnett v. Roberts that a person may be an independent contractor in some work and an employee in other work for the same hiring party. Each engagement is assessed on its own three elements and its own facts, so a business that uses the same contractor for a second, differently structured project should run the analysis again rather than relying on the earlier classification. Attorney review is an option where the exposure is significant.