Nevada Independent Contractor Agreement Template
Nevada runs three classification tests whose presumptions point in opposite directions, and only one of them turns on what your contract says.
Find out where you stand in Nevada
What do you need the contractor agreement for?
DocDraft provides document preparation, not legal advice.
Introduction
An Independent Contractor Agreement engages a freelancer, consultant, or tradesperson in Nevada without creating an employment relationship. Nevada does not have one classification test. It has three, and they run in opposite directions. For wage and hour claims under NRS chapter 608, NRS 608.0155 conclusively presumes that a person IS an independent contractor when its conditions are met, and one of those conditions is a term that must appear in the contract itself. For unemployment insurance under NRS chapter 612, NRS 612.085 is a genuine ABC test in which services for wages are deemed to be employment unless the hiring party proves all three prongs to the Administrator. For workers' compensation under NRS chapters 616A to 616D, NRS 616B.603 applies a third and different independent enterprise plus same trade standard. Widely published summaries call Nevada an ABC state without qualification. That is accurate for unemployment insurance and inaccurate for wage and hour, which is the setting in which most independent contractor agreements are actually drafted. Drafting well buys you the chapter 608 presumption. It does not buy you the other two.
Key Things to Know
- 1
Nevada applies a different classification test depending on which law is being enforced, and the presumptions point in opposite directions. NRS 608.0155 presumes independent contractor status for wage and hour purposes. NRS 612.085 presumes employment for unemployment insurance purposes. NRS 616B.603 uses a third standard for workers' compensation. One relationship can land differently under each.
- 2
The lead-in words of NRS 608.0155(1) do the work: a person is conclusively presumed to be an independent contractor 'for the purposes of this chapter.' That phrase confines the pro-contractor presumption to NRS chapter 608, meaning minimum wage, overtime, and wage payment claims before the Office of the Labor Commissioner. It does not travel to unemployment insurance or workers' compensation.
- 3
NRS 608.0155(1) requires three things together, not two. Paragraph (a) asks whether the person holds or has applied for an EIN or Social Security number, or filed a business or self-employment tax return with the IRS in the previous year, unless the person is a foreign national legally present in the United States. Paragraph (b) is a contract term. Paragraph (c) requires satisfying three or more of five criteria.
- 4
Paragraph (b) is a drafting instruction. NRS 608.0155(1)(b) requires that the person be required by the contract with the principal to hold any necessary state or local business license and to maintain any necessary occupational license, insurance, or bonding to operate in Nevada. If your Nevada agreement omits that covenant, the presumption is forfeited no matter how independently the work is actually performed. The word maintain imports a continuing duty, so it cannot be written as a one-time signing representation.
- 5
The five criteria under NRS 608.0155(1)(c) are control over the means and manner of the work, control over the timing of the work, no requirement to work exclusively for one principal, freedom to hire employees to assist, and a substantial investment of capital. Three of the five are enough. Each maps onto a clause you either include or leave out, so exclusivity terms and bans on subcontracting have a direct statutory cost.
- 6
NRS 608.0155(3) is a one-way ratchet, and it is where most summaries go wrong. Failing to satisfy three or more of the paragraph (c) criteria does not automatically create a presumption that the person is an employee. The statute grants a presumption in one direction only and expressly declines to supply the mirror image, so falling short returns you to the ordinary analysis rather than deciding the question against you.
- 7
A well-drafted Nevada contract does not prevent misclassification liability generally. NRS 607.216 defines employee misclassification to span minimum wage, overtime, unemployment insurance, workers' compensation insurance, temporary disability insurance, wage payment, and payroll taxes at the same time, each judged by its own test. The licensing and insurance covenant addresses chapter 608 exposure only, and the Labor Commissioner can also refer matters to other agencies and to the Attorney General.
Key decisions before you file
Before you file a Independent Contractor Agreement in Nevada, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Independent Contractor Agreement guide walks through them.
Open the Independent Contractor Agreement guideCustomize your Independent Contractor Agreement Template with DocDraft
Nevada Requirements for Independent Contractor Agreement
NRS 608.0155(1)(b) conditions the chapter 608 conclusive presumption of independent contractor status on the contract with the principal requiring the person to hold any necessary state or local business license and to maintain any necessary occupational license, insurance, or bonding to operate in Nevada. Include an affirmative covenant tracking that language. Because the statute says maintain, draft a continuing obligation for the life of the engagement rather than a one-time representation, and key insurance to what the trade actually requires rather than an arbitrary coverage figure.
Under NRS 608.0155(1)(a), unless the person is a foreign national legally present in the United States, the person must possess or have applied for an employer identification number or Social Security number, or have filed an income tax return for a business or for earnings from self-employment with the Internal Revenue Service in the previous year. Foreign national takes the meaning ascribed in NRS 294A.325.
NRS 608.0155(1)(c) requires the person to satisfy at least three of five criteria: control and discretion over the means and manner of the work; control over the time the work is performed, apart from agreement on the completion schedule and range of work hours; no requirement to work exclusively for one principal, subject to narrow exceptions; freedom to hire employees to assist; and a substantial investment of capital judged against the income, equipment, and expenses ordinary in the trade. Exclusivity clauses and bans on subcontracting reduce the count.
NRS 608.0155(3) provides that failure to satisfy three or more of the paragraph (c) criteria does not automatically create a presumption that the person is an employee. The statute operates in one direction only. Falling short of the criteria returns the question to the ordinary analysis rather than resolving it against the hiring party.
NRS 608.0155(2) removes a natural person licensed under NRS chapter 624, and a natural person directly compensated by such a licensee for providing labor requiring a chapter 624 license, from the general route and applies its own three-part test that must be met in full. NRS 608.0155(4)(b) provides that providing labor does not include the delivery of supplies.
For unemployment insurance under NRS chapter 612, services performed for wages are deemed to be employment unless it is shown to the satisfaction of the Administrator that the person is and will remain free from control or direction under the contract and in fact, that the service is outside the usual course of the business or performed outside all places of business of the enterprise, and that the service is performed in an independently established trade of the same nature as the contract work. The burden is on the hiring party, and the NRS 608.0155 presumption does not apply. Determinations are made by the Employment Security Division of DETR.
Under NRS 616B.603, a hiring party is not an employer if it contracts with an independent enterprise and is not in the same trade, business, profession, or occupation as that enterprise. An independent enterprise is a person holding themselves out as engaged in a separate business who either holds a business or occupational license in their own name or owns, rents, or leases property used in furtherance of the business. The exemption does not apply to a principal contractor licensed under NRS chapter 624 or to a real estate broker with respect to an associated broker-salesperson or salesperson under NRS 645.520. Administered by the Workers' Compensation Section of the Division of Industrial Relations.
NRS 607.216 defines employee misclassification as improperly classifying employees as independent contractors to avoid obligations under state labor, employment, and tax laws, expressly including minimum wage, overtime, unemployment insurance, workers' compensation insurance, temporary disability insurance, wage payment, and payroll taxes. NRS 608.400 prohibits coerced or intentional misclassification, with graduated administrative penalties imposed by the Labor Commissioner after notice and an opportunity for a hearing under NRS 607.207, plus referral to other agencies and the Attorney General. Drafting to NRS 608.0155 addresses chapter 608 exposure only. Verify the current text of these statutes before relying on any of them for a specific engagement.
No Nevada statute requires an independent contractor agreement to be in writing as a precondition to the engagement. A writing is nonetheless a practical condition of the chapter 608 presumption, because NRS 608.0155(1)(b) requires the contract to impose the licensing and insurance obligation, and because NRS 608.0155(1)(c)(3)(II) recognizes a written contract to serve a single principal for a limited period. For unemployment insurance, a written contract or a Form 1099 carries no presumptive weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
Only for part of the picture, and the unqualified label causes real problems. NRS 612.085 is a genuine ABC test, and it governs unemployment insurance. Wage and hour claims run on a different statute, NRS 608.0155, which presumes independent contractor status rather than employment. Calling Nevada an ABC state without naming the law being applied inverts the rule for the setting in which most contractor agreements are written.
Three things together. First, unless the person is a foreign national legally present in the United States, the person possesses or has applied for an employer identification number or Social Security number, or filed an income tax return for a business or for self-employment earnings with the IRS in the previous year. Second, the contract with the principal requires the person to hold any necessary state or local business license and to maintain any necessary occupational license, insurance, or bonding to operate in Nevada. Third, the person satisfies three or more of five listed criteria. All three parts must be present.
The licensing and insurance obligation. NRS 608.0155(1)(b) does not ask whether the worker happens to hold the right licenses; it asks whether the person is required by the contract with the principal to hold them and to maintain any necessary occupational license, insurance, or bonding. An agreement that leaves the covenant out gives up the chapter 608 presumption regardless of how the relationship works day to day. Because the statute says maintain, draft it as a continuing duty for the life of the engagement rather than a representation made once at signing.
No, and it is important not to read it that way. The covenant buys the conclusive presumption under NRS chapter 608, which covers minimum wage, overtime, and wage payment. Unemployment insurance is decided under the ABC test in NRS 612.085 and workers' compensation under NRS 616B.603, and neither is affected by that clause. NRS 607.216 defines employee misclassification to span minimum wage, overtime, unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, temporary disability insurance, wage payment, and payroll taxes at once, so a single engagement can be judged correctly under one chapter and wrongly under another.
Not automatically. NRS 608.0155(3) states expressly that failing to satisfy three or more of the paragraph (c) criteria does not create a presumption that the person is an employee. The statute is a one-way ratchet: it supplies a presumption favoring contractor status when its conditions are met and refuses to supply the opposite inference when they are not. Falling short means the ordinary analysis applies rather than the question being decided against the hiring party.
Control and discretion over the means and manner of the work, where the result rather than the method is what the principal bargained for; control over the time the work is performed, apart from agreement on the completion schedule and the range of work hours; no requirement to work exclusively for one principal, subject to narrow exceptions for legal prohibitions and written limited-period single-principal contracts; freedom to hire employees to assist with the work; and a substantial investment of capital, assessed against the income received and the equipment and expenses ordinary in that trade. Three of the five suffice.
Under NRS 612.085, services performed for wages are deemed to be employment unless it is shown to the satisfaction of the Administrator that the person is and will remain free from control or direction both under the contract and in fact, that the service is outside the usual course of the business or performed outside all of the places of business of the enterprise, and that the service is performed in an independently established trade or business of the same nature as the contract work. The burden sits on the hiring party, and all three prongs must be met. A written contract or a Form 1099 does not by itself establish contractor status here.
Possibly. NRS 616B.603 asks a separate question: a hiring party is not an employer if it contracts with an independent enterprise and is not in the same trade, business, profession, or occupation as that enterprise. An independent enterprise is a person holding themselves out as engaged in a separate business who either holds a business or occupational license in their own name or owns, rents, or leases property used in furtherance of the business. The same trade limit is the most common reason the exemption fails, and it does not apply to principal contractors licensed under NRS chapter 624 or to real estate brokers with respect to associated salespersons.
Yes. NRS 608.0155(2) carves a natural person who is licensed under NRS chapter 624, or who is directly compensated by such a licensee for providing labor requiring a chapter 624 license, out of the general route and applies its own three-part test, which must be satisfied in full. Providing labor is defined not to include the delivery of supplies. Note also that the workers' compensation exemption in NRS 616B.603 is unavailable to a principal contractor licensed under chapter 624.
NRS 608.400 bars an employer from using coercion, misrepresentation, or fraud to require a person to be classified as an independent contractor or to form a business entity for that purpose, and from intentionally misclassifying a person as other than an employee. The Labor Commissioner may impose graduated administrative penalties after notice and an opportunity for a hearing under NRS 607.207, beginning with a warning for a first non-willful offense and escalating for willful and repeat conduct, and may refer matters to other agencies and to the Attorney General. Unpaid contributions, interest, and penalties can also arise separately under NRS chapter 612 for unemployment insurance and under NRS chapter 616 for uninsured workers' compensation exposure.