Skip to content

Idaho Motion for Contempt

Idaho bars starting a contempt case with an order to show cause and instead requires a motion and affidavit, or the judge's own written charge, filed inside the existing family case.

Find out where you stand in Idaho

What court order is not being followed?

DocDraft provides document preparation, not legal advice.

Introduction

In Idaho, a family court contempt case is brought as a motion and affidavit for contempt, or, if the judge acts on their own, a written charge of contempt; Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 75, applied through Idaho Rule of Family Law Procedure 812, expressly bars using an order to show cause to start the case. The motion is filed inside the pending divorce, custody, or child support case, not as a new lawsuit. Idaho has no mandatory statewide contempt form; the Idaho Court Assistance Office's generic Motion (CAO_CvPi_4-1x), Notice of Hearing (CAO_CvPi_4-2x), Order (CAO_CvPi_4-4x), and Affidavit (CAO_CvPi_4-17x) forms are what the courts and Idaho Legal Aid point self-represented filers to. A motion brought by anyone other than a judge must be commenced by a motion and affidavit; it does not need to allege that the violation was willful, but it must state the specific facts of each instance of contempt separately and that the respondent was served with, or knew of, the order. If the respondent is already a party to the case, the hearing notice may be served by mail under Rule 5(b) unless the court orders personal service; if the respondent is not yet a party, service must follow the summons rules in Rule 4. Notice of the hearing must be served no later than 7 days before the initial appearance, unless the court orders otherwise, and if the respondent denies the charge, the case is set for trial with at least 14 days to prepare. Idaho splits the sanction the court can impose into two tracks with different proof standards: a civil sanction requires the court to find every element proved and that the respondent has the present ability to comply, by a preponderance of the evidence; a criminal sanction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. General contempt carries a fine of up to $5,000 and up to 5 days in jail; disobeying a child support order specifically allows up to 30 additional days in jail on top of the fine, and the court cannot stack criminal sanctions across multiple counts in one proceeding past 6 months unless the respondent was given or waived a jury trial. Where the contempt is a failure to do an act the respondent can still perform, the court may jail the respondent until the act is done, and the order must specify that act; jail is not a punishment the filer chooses, and the court alone decides whether contempt happened at all. A respondent can defend by showing an inability to comply, a lack of knowledge of the order, or that the court lacked jurisdiction, and the court may award attorney's fees and costs to whichever side prevails in the contempt proceeding, regardless of the sanction imposed. Do not withhold child support because parenting time was denied, and do not withhold parenting time because support is unpaid; either can itself be treated as contempt. For a parenting time dispute alone, Idaho's separate enforcement petition under Idaho Rule of Family Law Procedure 816, not a contempt filing, tends to move faster, with service at least 14 days before the hearing, a hearing within 28 days of filing, and a presumption that the case resolves within 42 days, and it can award make up parenting time. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Child Support Services is the state's child support agency, and Idaho courts must order income withholding in nearly all support orders. This page does not cover changing the amount of support or the custody schedule; use DocDraft's child support modification and parenting plan pages for that, and if there is domestic violence or a safety risk, use DocDraft's getting a restraining order guide instead of this motion. Attorney review is available before you file.

Key Things to Know

  1. 1

    Idaho calls this a motion and affidavit for contempt, or, if the judge acts alone, a written charge of contempt; Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 75 expressly forbids starting a contempt case with an order to show cause. There is no mandatory statewide form; the Idaho Court Assistance Office's generic Motion (CAO_CvPi_4-1x), Notice of Hearing (CAO_CvPi_4-2x), Order (CAO_CvPi_4-4x), and Affidavit (CAO_CvPi_4-17x) forms are what courts and Idaho Legal Aid point filers to.

  2. 2

    If the respondent is already a party to the case, notice of the hearing may be served by mail under Rule 5(b) unless the court orders personal service; if not yet a party, service follows the summons rules in Rule 4. Notice must be served no later than 7 days before the initial appearance, unless the court orders otherwise, and if the respondent denies the charge, the case is set for trial with at least 14 days to prepare.

  3. 3

    Idaho splits every contempt case into two tracks with different proof standards: a civil sanction requires proof of every element and of the respondent's present ability to comply, by a preponderance of the evidence, while a criminal sanction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

  4. 4

    General contempt carries a fine of up to $5,000 and up to 5 days in jail; disobeying a child support order specifically allows up to 30 additional days in jail on top of the fine, and consecutive criminal sanctions across multiple counts in one proceeding cannot exceed 6 months unless the respondent was given or waived a jury trial.

  5. 5

    If the contempt is a failure to do an act still in the respondent's power, the court may jail the respondent until it is done, with that act specified; jail is not a punishment the filer picks, and the court alone decides whether contempt occurred. The court may also award attorney's fees and costs to whichever side wins the contempt proceeding, regardless of the sanction imposed.

  6. 6

    A respondent can defend a civil sanction by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, a present inability to comply, or defend a criminal sanction by raising a reasonable doubt about their ability to comply at the time of the violation; lack of knowledge of the order and lack of jurisdiction are also listed defenses.

  7. 7

    Do not withhold child support because parenting time was denied, and do not withhold parenting time because support is unpaid; either can itself be treated as contempt. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Child Support Services can enforce support without a private motion, and a parenting time only dispute may move faster through the separate, non-contempt enforcement petition under Idaho Rule of Family Law Procedure 816.

Key decisions before you file

Before you file a Motion for Contempt in Idaho, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Motion for Contempt guide walks through them.

Open the Motion for Contempt guide

Customize your Motion for Contempt Template with DocDraft

Idaho Requirements for Motion for Contempt

  • Motion and Affidavit Required, No Order to Show Cause

    Contempt proceedings brought by anyone other than a judge must be commenced by a motion and affidavit; Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 75(c)(2) expressly bars starting the case with an order to show cause. A judge may instead initiate contempt on their own with a written charge served on the respondent.

  • No Mandatory Form, But Generic Forms Available

    No statewide mandatory or dedicated contempt form exists. The Idaho Court Assistance Office's generic Motion (CAO_CvPi_4-1x), Notice of Hearing (CAO_CvPi_4-2x), Order (CAO_CvPi_4-4x), and Affidavit (CAO_CvPi_4-17x) forms are used for a contempt filing.

  • Service Method Depends on Party Status, With 7 Days Notice

    If the respondent is already a party to the case, service may be by mail under Rule 5(b) unless the court orders personal service; if not yet a party, service follows the summons rules in Rule 4. Notice of the hearing must be served at least 7 days before the initial appearance, unless the court orders otherwise (I.R.C.P. 75(d)(1)-(3)).

  • 14 Days to Prepare for Trial If the Charge Is Denied

    If the respondent denies the charge of contempt, the matter must be set for a trial, and the respondent must be given at least 14 days to prepare for it, unless otherwise ordered by the court (I.R.C.P. 75(g)(2)).

  • Civil and Criminal Sanctions Use Different Burdens

    To impose a civil sanction, the court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that every element of contempt is proved and that the respondent has the present ability to comply. A criminal sanction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt (I.R.C.P. 75(h)(1)-(2), 75(j)(1)-(2)).

  • Jail and Fine Caps, With a Purge Condition

    General contempt allows a fine of up to $5,000 and up to 5 days in jail; disobeying a child support order allows up to 30 additional days in jail on top of the fine (Idaho Code Sec. 7-610). Consecutive criminal sanctions across multiple counts in one proceeding cannot exceed 6 months unless the respondent was given or waived a jury trial (I.R.C.P. 75(i)(1)), and a jail order confining someone until they perform an act must specify that act (Idaho Code Sec. 7-611).

  • Discretionary Attorney's Fees to the Prevailing Party

    The court may, in its discretion, award attorney's fees and costs to the prevailing party in the contempt proceeding, regardless of whether the court imposes a civil sanction, a criminal sanction, or no sanction at all (Idaho Code Sec. 7-610; I.R.C.P. 75(m)).

  • Present-Ability-to-Comply and Related Defenses

    A respondent may raise a present inability to comply as a defense to a civil sanction, or an inability to comply at the time of the violation as a defense to a criminal sanction, along with lack of knowledge of the order, lack of personal jurisdiction, or lack of jurisdiction to issue the order (I.R.C.P. 75(h)(1)).

  • Each Instance Stated Separately, With Notice or Knowledge of the Order

    The motion must set forth the specific facts of each instance of alleged contempt separately, and, for an order violation, allege that the respondent was served with the order or had actual knowledge of it; the motion does not need to allege that the noncompliance was willful (I.R.C.P. 75(c)(3)).

Frequently Asked Questions