Skip to content

Maryland Non-Disclosure Agreement Requirements

Maryland has no statute limiting what an employer can require an employee to assign under an invention-assignment clause, unlike California, Delaware, or several other states, so ordinary contract terms control instead.

Introduction

Maryland has no statute limiting what an employer can require an employee to assign under an invention-assignment clause, unlike California, Delaware, or several other states, so ordinary contract terms control instead. Trade secrets shared under a Maryland NDA are protected independently by the Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Commercial Law Sections 11-1201 through 11-1209), and a misappropriation claim generally must be filed within three years of when the misappropriation was discovered or reasonably should have been. The wage-based noncompete ban goes further than a single threshold: Labor and Employment Section 3-716 also voids noncompete clauses entirely for licensed veterinary practitioners and technicians regardless of pay, and separately caps them at one year and a 10-mile radius for direct-patient-care healthcare workers earning more than $350,000 a year. A Non-Disclosure Agreement in Maryland is otherwise an ordinary, enforceable contract, mutual or one-way, in which the parties agree to keep specified information confidential. As with any NDA, the practical drafting risk is scope: a confidentiality definition broad enough to function as a work restriction is what triggers Section 3-716 in the first place.

0/5000

Key Things to Know

  1. 1

    Maryland has no invention-assignment carve-out statute. A 2020 bill, House Bill 1466, would have voided certain intellectual property assignment provisions in employment contracts, similar to California's Labor Code Section 2870, but it failed in committee and was never enacted.

  2. 2

    The same statute voids noncompete clauses entirely for licensed veterinary practitioners and technicians, with no wage threshold at all, and separately caps noncompetes at one year and a 10-mile geographic radius for direct-patient-care healthcare workers earning more than $350,000 annually.

  3. 3

    Trade secret protection in Maryland runs through the Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Commercial Law Sections 11-1201 through 11-1209), separate from whatever the NDA itself says.

  4. 4

    A trade secret misappropriation claim in Maryland generally must be filed within three years of when the misappropriation was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered (Commercial Law Section 11-1206), and a continuing misappropriation counts as a single claim rather than restarting the clock.

  5. 5

    Maryland's Labor and Employment Section 3-716 voids noncompete and conflict-of-interest clauses for any employee who earns at or below 150% of the state minimum wage, currently $22.50 an hour based on Maryland's $15.00 minimum wage, a threshold an overly broad NDA confidentiality clause could functionally cross.

  6. 6

    Mutual NDAs, where both sides share confidential information, and one-way NDAs, where only one side does, are both ordinary enforceable contracts in Maryland; which one fits depends on whether the exchange runs both directions, like a partnership or acquisition discussion, or one direction, like pitching an investor.

  7. 7

    A Maryland court can order injunctive relief to stop an ongoing or threatened breach of a valid NDA, and if the disclosed information qualifies as a trade secret, the Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act allows exemplary damages up to twice the award, plus attorney's fees, for willful and malicious misappropriation.

Key decisions before you file

Before you file a Non-Disclosure Agreement in Maryland, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Non-Disclosure Agreement guide walks through them.

Open the Non-Disclosure Agreement guide

Customize your Non-Disclosure Agreement Template with DocDraft

Maryland Requirements for Non-Disclosure Agreement

  • Definition of Confidential Information (Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law Section 11-1201 et seq.)

    Clearly defines what constitutes confidential information under Maryland law, including trade secrets as defined in the Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Section 11-1201(e)).

  • Federal Trade Secret Protection (Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, 18 U.S.C. Section 1836 et seq.)

    Acknowledges federal protection of trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, which provides federal jurisdiction for trade secret misappropriation and remedies including injunctive relief and damages.

  • Permitted Disclosures (Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, 18 U.S.C. Section 1833(b)(1) and (b)(2))

    Addresses the substantive immunity created by the DTSA: an individual cannot be held criminally or civilly liable for disclosing a trade secret in confidence to a government official or an attorney solely to report a suspected legal violation, or for disclosing it in a court filing made under seal, and this extends to using the trade secret in a sealed anti-retaliation lawsuit.

  • Remedies for Breach (Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law Section 11-1202, Section 11-1203)

    Specifies available remedies for breach involving a trade secret, including injunctive relief under Section 11-1202 and damages under Section 11-1203 (actual loss, unjust enrichment, or a reasonable royalty, plus exemplary damages up to double the award for willful and malicious misappropriation).

  • Jurisdiction and Venue (Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, Md. Code Ann., Cts. and Jud. Proc. Section 6-101 et seq.)

    Establishes that Maryland's courts have personal jurisdiction and venue over a dispute arising from this Agreement, consistent with Title 6 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. Title 6 does not establish a choice-of-law rule, and Maryland has no statute selecting which state's substantive law governs a contract; that question is instead addressed by the common-law lex loci contractus rule, reflected operatively in documentText's Governing Law section.

  • Non-Solicitation and Restrictive Covenant Provisions (Becker v. Bailey, 268 Md. 93 (1973); Md. Code Ann., Lab. and Empl. Section 3-716(a)(2))

    Becker v. Bailey established Maryland's common-law reasonableness test for restrictive covenants: enforceable only if no broader in time and geography than necessary to protect a legitimate business interest, and only against employees who provide unique services or could misuse trade secrets, routes, or client lists. Sharpened to note why this case law, not the newer Section 3-716 wage-tiered statute, still governs a client- or patient-list provision: Section 3-716(a)(2) expressly excludes 'the taking or use of a client or patient list or other proprietary client-related or patient-related information' from its noncompete ban.

  • Electronic Signatures (Maryland Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law Section 21-101 et seq.; Federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN), 15 U.S.C. Section 7001 et seq.)

    Acknowledges the validity of electronic signatures under both Maryland and federal law for executing the NDA.

  • Notice Requirement for Trade Secret Immunity (Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, 18 U.S.C. Section 1833(b)(3))

    Section 1833(b)(3) requires an employer to include notice of the Section 1833(b) immunity in any contract or agreement with an employee governing the use of a trade secret or other confidential information, and ties noncompliance to a reduction in the exemplary damages and attorney's fees the employer could otherwise recover from that employee under the Act. Retitled and redescribed from a restatement of the immunity's substance (already covered in the Permitted Disclosures row) to the distinct notice obligation this subsection actually creates.

  • Dispute Resolution (Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act, Md. Code Ann., Cts. and Jud. Proc. Section 3-201 et seq.)

    Establishes procedures for resolving disputes through arbitration, in accordance with Maryland's Uniform Arbitration Act. Verified across Sections 3-201 (definitions used in the Act's own procedural sections), 3-202 (jurisdiction to enforce an arbitration agreement and enter judgment on an award), and 3-206 (a written arbitration agreement is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable).

  • Compliance with Securities Laws (Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. Section 77a et seq.; Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78a et seq.)

    Ensures the NDA does not restrict disclosures required by federal securities laws, particularly relevant when dealing with potential investors.

  • Protective Order for Compelled Disclosure (Maryland Rules of Civil Procedure, Md. Rule 2-403)

    Rule 2-403 lets a party or nonparty move for a protective order to limit discovery or the disclosure of sensitive information, on a showing of good cause, before complying with a subpoena or other compelled-disclosure demand. Retitled and narrowed from 'Notification of Disclosure Requests' because the Rule establishes a protective-order mechanism, not a freestanding duty to notify the disclosing Party before responding.

  • Data Privacy Compliance (Maryland Personal Information Protection Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law Section 14-3501 et seq.)

    Ensures handling of personal information complies with Maryland's Personal Information Protection Act and relevant federal privacy laws.

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions are loading.