Wyoming Non-Disclosure Agreement Requirements
Wyoming's 2025 non-compete ban, Wyoming Statute 1-23-108 as enacted by Senate File 107, applies only to contracts signed on or after its July 1, 2025 effective date, does not touch a covenant tied to selling a business, and leaves room for executive, management, and certain relocation-expense provisions; physician non-competes are separately voided under the same statute.
Introduction
Wyoming's 2025 non-compete ban, Wyoming Statute 1-23-108 as enacted by Senate File 107, applies only to contracts signed on or after its July 1, 2025 effective date, does not touch a covenant tied to selling a business, and leaves room for executive, management, and certain relocation-expense provisions; physician non-competes are separately voided under the same statute. It is one of the most sweeping non-compete bans in the country, voiding any covenant not to compete that restricts a person's right to be paid for skilled or unskilled labor, with only narrow exceptions. A Non-Disclosure Agreement in Wyoming is a contract in which one or both parties agree to keep specified information confidential, and it survives this law because of one of those exceptions: Section 1-23-108(a)(ii) keeps a covenant not to compete enforceable to the extent it protects trade secrets, which is exactly the kind of protection an NDA is built to provide. A Wyoming NDA is otherwise an ordinary, enforceable confidentiality contract, mutual or one-way, protecting trade secrets and other sensitive information shared between parties. Trade secrets themselves are protected separately under the Wyoming Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Wyoming Statute 40-24-101 through 40-24-110), and a misappropriation claim generally must be filed within four years of when the misappropriation was discovered or reasonably should have been, a year longer than the three-year period used in many other states. The practical effect for drafting is that a Wyoming NDA's confidentiality definition should stay anchored to actual trade secrets and sensitive information rather than drift into a broader restraint on someone's ability to work, since that broader restraint is exactly what Section 1-23-108 now voids.
Key Things to Know
- 1
That trade-secret exception runs through the substance of what the NDA actually protects, not its label. An NDA that stays focused on genuine trade secrets and other sensitive information, without functioning as a broader restraint on someone's ability to work afterward, fits within Section 1-23-108(a)(ii) rather than the categories the statute voids.
- 2
Wyoming's 2025 non-compete ban (Wyoming Statute 1-23-108, enacted by Senate File 107, effective July 1, 2025) voids most covenants not to compete that restrict a person's right to be paid for labor, but it carves out a covenant to the extent it protects trade secrets, which is the exception that keeps an NDA's confidentiality terms enforceable.
- 3
Trade secret protection runs through the Wyoming Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Wyoming Statute 40-24-101 through 40-24-110), separate from whatever the NDA itself says.
- 4
A trade secret misappropriation claim in Wyoming generally must be filed within four years of when the misappropriation was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered (Wyoming Statute 40-24-106), a year longer than the three-year period found in many other states' trade secret statutes.
- 5
Wyoming has no employee invention-assignment carve-out statute. Wyoming case law (Preston v. Marathon Oil Co., 277 P.3d 82 (Wyo. 2012)) instead holds that an existing employee's continued at-will employment is, by itself, enough consideration to support a new invention-assignment agreement, without requiring anything extra from the employer.
- 6
Mutual NDAs, where both sides share confidential information, and one-way NDAs, where only one side does, are both ordinary enforceable contracts in Wyoming; which one fits depends on whether the exchange runs both directions, like a partnership or acquisition discussion, or one direction, like pitching an investor.
- 7
A Wyoming court can order injunctive relief to stop an ongoing or threatened breach of a valid NDA, in addition to any damages the disclosure caused.
Key decisions before you file
Before you file a Non-Disclosure Agreement in Wyoming, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Non-Disclosure Agreement guide walks through them.
Open the Non-Disclosure Agreement guideCustomize your Non-Disclosure Agreement Template with DocDraft
Wyoming Requirements for Non-Disclosure Agreement
Clearly defines what constitutes confidential information under Wyoming law. The trade secret definition itself lives at Wyo. Stat. 40-24-101(a)(iv), part of the Wyoming Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Specific provisions addressing the protection of trade secrets in accordance with Wyoming's adoption of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, including remedies for misappropriation.
Provisions acknowledging federal protection of trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, which provides federal jurisdiction for trade secret misappropriation.
Establishes valid consideration for the NDA as required under Wyoming contract law, which may include mutual promises to maintain confidentiality.
Specifies the time period for which confidential information must be protected. Effective July 1, 2025, Wyoming Statute 1-23-108, enacted by 2025 Senate File 107, voids most covenants not to compete that restrict a person's right to be paid for skilled or unskilled labor unless the covenant falls within one of four listed exceptions, including protection of trade secrets under subsection (a)(ii). A confidentiality clause's duration should stay tied to genuine trade secret and sensitive-information protection rather than functioning as an indefinite restraint on someone's ability to work.
Outlines circumstances under which disclosure is permitted, such as compliance with a Wyoming court order, subpoena, or other governmental requirement. This is an ordinary contractual carve-out rather than a rule the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure or Rules of Evidence themselves impose; those rules govern litigation procedure and evidence admissibility, not a private party's confidentiality obligations.
Provides for injunctive relief in Wyoming courts in the event of breach or threatened breach, acknowledging that monetary damages may be insufficient.
Wyoming Statute 5-1-107 lets a Wyoming court exercise personal jurisdiction over a dispute on any basis consistent with the Wyoming and United States constitutions; it governs jurisdiction and service of process, not choice of law. Governing law is instead established by the Parties' own choice-of-law clause under ordinary Wyoming contract principles, since Wyoming has no default place-of-performance choice-of-law statute comparable to some other states'.
Ensures compliance with federal securities laws when sharing financial information with potential investors, including anti-fraud provisions.
Acknowledges the validity of electronic signatures under Wyoming's adoption of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.
Provides that if any provision is found unenforceable under Wyoming law, the remainder of the agreement remains in effect.
Includes federally required immunity notice for whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets to government officials or attorneys for reporting suspected violations of law.
Addresses compliance with Wyoming's data privacy and security laws regarding personal information that may be included in confidential materials.
Prevents parties from circumventing the disclosing party to directly contact their clients, suppliers, or partners, consistent with Wyoming's unfair competition laws.
Addresses whether rights and obligations under the NDA may be assigned or delegated to third parties under Wyoming contract law.
Establishes that the NDA constitutes the entire agreement between parties, superseding prior discussions, in accordance with Wyoming's parol evidence rule.
Specifies that modifications to the NDA must be in writing and signed by all parties to be enforceable under Wyoming contract law.
Frequently Asked Questions
A Non-Disclosure Agreement in Wyoming is an ordinary contract in which one or both parties agree to keep specified information confidential. It can be mutual, where both sides share confidential information, or one-way, where only one side does. Trade secrets shared under the agreement are also separately protected by the Wyoming Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Wyoming Statute 40-24-101 through 40-24-110) regardless of what the NDA itself says.
Generally yes, if it is limited to protecting trade secrets. Wyoming Statute 1-23-108 voids most covenants not to compete that restrict a person's ability to be paid for labor, but the statute does not apply to a covenant not to compete to the extent it protects trade secrets as defined in Wyoming Statute 6-3-501(a)(xi). An NDA whose confidentiality clause stays focused on genuine trade secrets and sensitive information fits within that exception; one broad enough to functionally stop someone from working in their field does not.
Senate File 107, signed March 19, 2025 and effective July 1, 2025, added Wyoming Statute 1-23-108. It voids any covenant not to compete that restricts a person's right to receive compensation for skilled or unskilled labor, applying only to contracts signed on or after the effective date. It carves out covenants tied to selling a business, covenants protecting trade secrets, certain relocation and training expense-recovery provisions, and covenants covering executive and management personnel and their professional support staff; it also separately voids physician non-competes. Because the trade-secret exception survives, a Wyoming NDA whose confidentiality clause is genuinely about protecting trade secrets is not the kind of contract this law targets.
A trade secret misappropriation claim under the Wyoming Uniform Trade Secrets Act generally must be brought within four years after the misappropriation is discovered, or after it reasonably should have been discovered with reasonable diligence (Wyoming Statute 40-24-106). A continuing misappropriation counts as a single claim rather than restarting the clock with each new use or disclosure. A separate breach-of-contract claim over the NDA itself follows Wyoming's ordinary written-contract limitations period.
Wyoming has no statute excluding an employee's own-time inventions from an assignment clause the way some other states do. Wyoming case law, Preston v. Marathon Oil Co., 277 P.3d 82 (Wyo. 2012), instead holds that an existing at-will employee's continued employment is, by itself, sufficient consideration to support a new invention-assignment agreement, without any additional consideration required from the employer. Whether a Wyoming NDA or related employment agreement reaches an employee's own-time invention depends on how the assignment clause itself is written, not on a statutory carve-out.
It depends on whether confidential information will flow in both directions or only one. A mutual NDA fits a two-way exchange, such as a merger, partnership, or joint-venture discussion where both sides disclose sensitive information. A one-way NDA fits a one-directional exchange, such as pitching a business plan to a Wyoming investor who is not sharing anything confidential back. Both forms are equally enforceable in Wyoming; the choice is about which structure matches the actual relationship.
No. A Wyoming NDA is an ordinary contract, not a formal instrument like a will or power of attorney, so it does not require notarization or witnesses to be valid. It only needs the standard elements of a valid contract: an offer, acceptance, and consideration, along with signatures from the parties being bound.
The non-breaching party can seek injunctive relief to stop an ongoing or threatened disclosure, along with damages caused by the breach. If the disclosed information also qualifies as a trade secret, the Wyoming Uniform Trade Secrets Act provides an additional, independent basis for relief, including damages for actual loss and unjust enrichment, and, for willful and malicious misappropriation, exemplary damages up to twice the award, separate from whatever remedies the NDA itself specifies.