Alabama Child Custody Agreement
In Alabama a joint request for joint custody is the one thing a judge has to answer in writing before deciding otherwise.
Find out where you stand in Alabama
Where are you with the custody arrangement?
DocDraft provides document preparation, not legal advice.
Introduction
Alabama kept the traditional custody vocabulary. Ala. Code 30-3-151 defines joint legal custody, joint physical custody, sole legal custody, and sole physical custody, and the relocation article adds a further term of art, the principal residence of a child. What is unusual in Alabama is what happens when both parents ask for the same thing: under Ala. Code 30-3-152(c), if both parents request joint custody the presumption is that joint custody is in the best interest of the child, and joint custody shall be granted unless the court makes specific findings as to why joint custody is not granted. That is a real advantage, but it is not a guarantee, because 30-3-152(a) opens by saying the court shall in every case consider joint custody but may award any form of custody which is determined to be in the best interest of the child. The presumption also runs one way only, since 30-3-152(b) allows the court to order joint custody without the consent of both parents. And it attaches to the form of custody, joint or sole, rather than to the particular schedule you wrote, none of which takes effect until the court grants it in a final order.
Key Things to Know
- 1
Agreeing is worth something specific in Alabama, and the statute says what. Ala. Code 30-3-152(c) provides that if both parents request joint custody, the presumption is that joint custody is in the best interest of the child, and that joint custody shall be granted unless the court makes specific findings as to why joint custody is not granted. Agreement is separately listed as the first joint custody factor in 30-3-152(a)(1), the agreement or lack of agreement of the parents on joint custody. The presumption attaches to the form of custody rather than to your particular schedule, so it does not lock in the calendar you wrote.
- 2
The presumption is not a guarantee, it does not work in reverse, and it does not skip the judge. Section 30-3-152(a) begins by providing that the court shall in every case consider joint custody but may award any form of custody which is determined to be in the best interest of the child, and 30-3-152(b) allows the court to order joint custody without the consent of both parents, so refusing to agree does not block a joint custody award either. Joint custody is granted in the final order of the court under 30-3-152(c), and Alabama supplies no mechanism that gives the parents' agreement operative effect before that order is entered. A judge who departs from a joint request owes specific findings explaining why, which is a duty to explain rather than a bar on refusing.
- 3
Joint does not mean fifty fifty here, and the Code says so twice. Section 30-3-150 states that joint custody does not necessarily mean equal physical custody, and 30-3-151(3) repeats that joint physical custody does not necessarily mean physical custody of equal durations of time. Decision-making can also be split rather than shared across the board: 30-3-151(2) allows the court to designate one parent to have sole power to make certain decisions while both parents retain equal rights and responsibilities for other decisions. Write the schedule and the decision split you actually want instead of relying on the label.
- 4
Alabama prescribes what a joint custody agreement has to cover. Section 30-3-153(a) directs that in order to implement joint custody the court shall require the parents to submit, as part of their agreement, provisions covering the care and education of the child, medical and dental care, holidays and vacations, child support, other necessary factors affecting the child's physical or emotional health and well-being, and a designation of the parent possessing primary authority and responsibility regarding the child's involvement in academic, religious, civic, cultural, athletic and other activities and in medical and dental care if the parents are unable to agree. That last item is the one most generic forms leave out. The list is expressed as including but not limited to, so treat it as a floor.
- 5
Deadlock on the details does not sink joint custody. Section 30-3-153(b) provides that if the parties are unable to reach an agreement as to the provisions in subsection (a), the court shall set the plan. Parents who agree on joint custody but cannot settle the holiday split or the tie-breaker end up with a court-written plan rather than a denial. That is a reason to draft the details carefully, because whatever you leave open is decided for you.
- 6
Alabama's relocation rules are strict and they belong in the document. A parent intending to change the child's principal residence must give notice by certified mail not later than the 45th day before the intended change under Ala. Code 30-3-165, and a person entitled to notice who wants to stop the move must file a proceeding within 30 days after receiving it, failing which the change is authorized. Section 30-3-166 calls for a prescribed block of relocation notice language in Alabama child custody determinations entered after September 1, 2003. Section 30-3-162 keeps the contested relocation machinery from applying to a move of 60 miles or less from the non-relocating parent, or one that brings the child closer, unless it crosses a state line; the 45-day notice duty has no mileage floor and applies to any change of the child's principal residence. It also preserves an existing enforceable agreement between the parents on a change in the child's principal residence.
- 7
Domestic violence changes the analysis, and it can pull against a joint request. Ala. Code 30-3-131 provides that a determination by the court that domestic or family violence has occurred raises a rebuttable presumption that it is detrimental to the child to be placed in sole custody, joint legal custody, or joint physical custody with the perpetrator, and no criminal conviction is required to trigger it. Section 30-3-132 adds mandatory considerations for the safety and well-being of the child and the victim parent and bars holding a victim parent's absence or relocation against them, and 30-3-134 makes a finding of domestic violence since the last custody order a change in circumstances. Where the court has made such a finding, that presumption cuts directly against the joint request presumption in 30-3-152(c), and the statutes do not say which one prevails. If there has been abuse, coercion, or a protective order, talk to a lawyer before signing anything.
Key decisions before you file
Before you file a Child Custody Agreement in Alabama, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Child Custody Agreement guide walks through them.
Open the Child Custody Agreement guideCustomize your Child Custody Agreement Template with DocDraft
Alabama Requirements for Child Custody Agreement
If both parents request joint custody, the presumption is that joint custody is in the best interest of the child, and joint custody shall be granted unless the court makes specific findings as to why joint custody is not granted. State the joint request in plain words so the presumption is clearly invoked.
The court shall in every case consider joint custody but may award any form of custody which is determined to be in the best interest of the child. The joint request presumption obliges the court to explain a departure; it does not remove the court's choice.
The court may order joint custody without the consent of both parents. A joint request raises the statutory presumption; refusing to agree does not block a joint custody award.
The five listed factors are the agreement or lack of agreement of the parents on joint custody, their past and present ability to cooperate and make decisions jointly, their ability to encourage sharing of love, affection and contact with the other parent, any history of or potential for child abuse, spouse abuse, or kidnapping, and geographic proximity as it relates to the practical considerations of joint physical custody.
To implement joint custody the court shall require the parents to submit, as part of their agreement, provisions covering care and education, medical and dental care, holidays and vacations, child support, and other necessary factors affecting the child's physical or emotional health and well-being. The list reads including but not limited to, so treat it as a minimum.
The agreement must designate the parent possessing primary authority and responsibility regarding the child's involvement in academic, religious, civic, cultural, athletic and other activities, and in medical and dental care, if the parents are unable to agree. Name the parent for each area and keep the duty to notify and consult.
If the parties are unable to reach an agreement as to the provisions in subsection (a), the court shall set the plan. Whatever the parents leave unresolved is written for them, which is a reason to settle the details before filing.
Joint custody does not necessarily mean equal physical custody, and joint physical custody does not necessarily mean physical custody of equal durations of time. Set out the actual residential schedule; 30-3-151(2) also allows one parent to hold sole power over certain decisions while both retain equal rights on others.
Notice of a change in the child's principal residence must go by certified mail not later than the 45th day before the intended change, with the contents the section prescribes, and an objection must be filed within 30 days after receipt. Section 30-3-166 requires prescribed relocation notice language in custody determinations entered after September 1, 2003, and 30-3-162 preserves the parents' own enforceable agreement on the subject.
A determination by the court that domestic or family violence has occurred raises a rebuttable presumption that it is detrimental to the child to be placed in sole custody, joint legal custody, or joint physical custody with the perpetrator, with no conviction required. Section 30-3-132 adds mandatory safety considerations and protects a victim parent's absence or relocation from being held against them, and 30-3-134 makes a later finding a change in circumstances.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, and Alabama is specific about how. Ala. Code 30-3-152(c) provides that if both parents request joint custody, the presumption is that joint custody is in the best interest of the child, and joint custody shall be granted unless the court makes specific findings as to why joint custody is not granted. Agreement is also the first listed joint custody factor under 30-3-152(a)(1). What the presumption does not do is lock in your schedule, because it attaches to the form of custody rather than to the terms you wrote.
Yes. The arrangement carries legal force only once the court grants it in a final order, and until then contempt of a custody order is not available. Ala. Code 30-3-152(a) provides that the court shall in every case consider joint custody but may award any form of custody which is determined to be in the best interest of the child. Where both parents requested joint custody, a judge who awards something else has to make specific findings as to why joint custody is not granted.
Yes. Ala. Code 30-3-152(b) allows the court to order joint custody without the consent of both parents. That is what makes Alabama's rule one-directional: a joint request raises a presumption in favor of joint custody, but refusing to agree does not prevent a joint custody award. Section 30-3-152(a)(2) and (3) separately direct the court to weigh the parents' past and present ability to cooperate and make decisions jointly and their ability to encourage sharing of love, affection, and contact with the other parent.
No. Ala. Code 30-3-150 states that joint custody does not necessarily mean equal physical custody, and 30-3-151(3) repeats that joint physical custody does not necessarily mean physical custody of equal durations of time. Joint legal custody under 30-3-151(1) means both parents have equal rights and responsibilities for major decisions including education, health care, and religious training, and 30-3-151(2) allows one parent to be given sole power over certain decisions while both keep equal rights on the rest. Write out the schedule and the decision split rather than relying on the word joint.
Ala. Code 30-3-153(a) directs that in order to implement joint custody the court shall require the parents to submit, as part of their agreement, provisions covering the care and education of the child, the medical and dental care of the child, holidays and vacations, child support, other necessary factors that affect the physical or emotional health and well-being of the child, and a designation of the parent possessing primary authority and responsibility regarding the child's involvement in academic, religious, civic, cultural, athletic and other activities and in medical and dental care if the parents are unable to agree on those decisions. Because the section reads including but not limited to, those six are a minimum rather than a complete list.
The court fills the gap. Ala. Code 30-3-153(b) provides that if the parties are unable to reach an agreement as to the provisions in subsection (a), the court shall set the plan. Deadlock on the holiday split or on who breaks a tie therefore produces a court-written plan rather than a refusal of joint custody. The practical consequence is that anything you leave open is decided by someone who does not know your family's routine.
For the joint custody question, Ala. Code 30-3-152(a) lists five: the agreement or lack of agreement of the parents on joint custody; their past and present ability to cooperate and make decisions jointly; their ability to encourage the sharing of love, affection, and contact with the other parent; any history of or potential for child abuse, spouse abuse, or kidnapping; and the geographic proximity of the parents as it relates to the practical considerations of joint physical custody. For custody generally, Alabama does not print a factor list in its Code. Section 30-3-152(a) refers to the same factors considered in awarding sole legal and physical custody, and those come from decided cases rather than from a provision a parent can look up.
Ala. Code 30-3-165 requires notice by certified mail not later than the 45th day before the intended change of the child's principal residence, with prescribed contents including a proposed revised schedule of custody and visitation. A person entitled to notice who wants to stop the move must file a proceeding within 30 days after receiving it, and if nobody does the change is authorized. Section 30-3-162 keeps the contested relocation machinery from applying to a move of 60 miles or less from the non-relocating parent, or one that brings the child closer, unless the move crosses a state line. Section 30-3-166 also requires the prescribed relocation notice language in custody determinations entered after September 1, 2003.
Alabama expressly recognizes one. Ala. Code 30-3-162 provides that where the relocation article conflicts with an existing order or other enforceable agreement addressing the parties' rights on a change in the child's principal residence, the article does not apply to alter or amend the terms of that order or agreement. So a relocation clause the parents write for themselves is the sort of term Alabama takes seriously. Say plainly what distance or destination triggers it and what the revised schedule becomes.
No. Child support appears in Ala. Code 30-3-153(a)(4) as a subject the agreement has to address, but the amount is a separate calculation made under Alabama's child support rules and handled in its own filings. Cover it in the document because the statute lists it, and do not assume signing a custody arrangement has fixed what either parent pays.