Maryland Child Custody Agreement
Maryland leaves custody out of the terms spouses can bind themselves to, and since October 2025 it has a statutory factor list that treats your agreement as one factor of sixteen.
Find out where you stand in Maryland
Where are you with the custody arrangement?
DocDraft provides document preparation, not legal advice.
Introduction
Maryland gives an agreed custody arrangement no special legal weight, and its statute books now say so more plainly than they used to. Md. Code, Family Law 8-101 makes a written agreement between spouses valid and enforceable as to alimony, support, property rights and personal rights, and custody does not appear on that list. Family Law 8-103(a) then states the point without ambiguity: the court may modify any provision of a deed, agreement or settlement with respect to the care, custody, education or support of a minor child of the spouses if the modification would be in the best interests of the child. No elevated standard attaches because the parents agreed. What the agreement does get is a seat at the table, since Family Law 9-201(a)(11) makes any prior court orders or agreements one of sixteen factors the court may consider. Those sixteen factors are new law, added by chapter 483 of the 2025 Maryland laws and effective October 1, 2025, replacing a position that had rested entirely on case law. A Maryland agreement is still worth drafting with care, but it works as a proposal and as evidence rather than as a contract that settles custody.
Key Things to Know
- 1
Custody is carved out of Maryland's binding-agreement rule. Family Law 8-101 lists the subjects a written agreement between spouses is valid and enforceable for, and custody is not among them. Family Law 8-103(a) then allows the court to modify any custody provision of a deed, agreement or settlement whenever modification would be in the best interests of the child. Note that 8-101 speaks of spouses, and Maryland's Family Law article supplies no equivalent enforceability rule for parents who were never married.
- 2
The agreement is not weightless. Family Law 9-201(a)(11) makes any prior court orders or agreements one of the sixteen factors a court may consider in deciding what legal custody and physical custody serve the child. That is a real place in the analysis, but it is one factor of sixteen rather than a presumption, and Maryland's statutes create no obligation to adopt what the parents proposed.
- 3
The arrangement binds only once a court makes it an order. Parents file the agreement or plan with the court, and if the court determines the arrangement is in the child's best interest it may be written into an order that the court can then enforce. In a divorce, Family Law 8-105 sets up two tracks: provisions merged into the decree are enforceable by contempt, while provisions incorporated but not merged are enforceable by contempt or as an independent contract. Either way, 8-105(b) leaves custody provisions subject to modification under 8-103, so drafting cannot make a custody term permanent.
- 4
Maryland's best interest factors are new. Chapter 483 of the 2025 Maryland laws added Family Law 9-201 and took effect October 1, 2025, putting sixteen factors into statute for the first time and superseding the position that the factors were purely judge-made. The list is open, since factor (16) is any other factor the court considers appropriate. Older guidance describing Maryland custody factors as a matter of case law only is out of date.
- 5
The factor list is permissive, but the findings are not. Family Law 9-201(a) says the court may consider the listed factors, so a judge is not obliged to give any one of them weight. Family Law 9-201(b) then requires the court to articulate findings of fact, on the record or in writing, including its consideration of each factor in subsection (a). A judge may decline to be moved by a factor but may not decline to address it, which is a reason to write an agreement that speaks to the factors rather than one that only states an outcome.
- 6
Three provisions sit above the factor list and an agreement cannot route around them. Family Law 9-201(a) opens by making the factors subject to Family Law 9-101, 9-101.1 and 9-101.2. Under 9-101, where the court has reasonable grounds to believe a child has been abused or neglected by a party, it shall deny custody or visitation to that party unless it specifically finds no likelihood of further abuse or neglect, with supervised visitation as the only permitted middle course. Under 9-101.1 the court shall consider evidence of abuse by a party against the other parent, the party's spouse, or any child in the household, including a child other than the one in the case, and shall arrange custody or visitation to protect the child and the victim of the abuse.
- 7
Two things about Maryland are commonly stated wrongly. Maryland has no presumption of joint custody, and the 2025 bills that would have created one did not pass. Maryland also does not automatically require ninety days' notice before a move: Family Law 9-106(a)(1) provides that the court may include a ninety-day advance written notice requirement as a condition of a custody or visitation order, so the duty exists only if the order contains it. Parents who want that protection should ask for the condition rather than assume it.
Key decisions before you file
Before you file a Child Custody Agreement in Maryland, a few decisions shape the document: which option to choose and what each one means. The Child Custody Agreement guide walks through them.
Open the Child Custody Agreement guideCustomize your Child Custody Agreement Template with DocDraft
Maryland Requirements for Child Custody Agreement
A written agreement between spouses is valid and enforceable as to alimony, support, property rights and personal rights. Custody does not appear in that enumeration, so a Maryland agreement should not be drafted as though signing it settles custody.
The court may modify any provision of a deed, agreement or settlement with respect to the care, custody, education or support of a minor child if the modification would be in the best interests of the child. No elevated standard applies to terms the parents agreed to.
Provisions merged into a divorce decree are enforceable by contempt; provisions stating they are incorporated but not merged are enforceable by contempt or as an independent contract. The document should state which election the parents make, while recognizing that 8-105(b) leaves custody provisions modifiable under 8-103 either way.
Sixteen factors govern what legal custody and physical custody are in a child's best interest, effective October 1, 2025 under chapter 483 of the 2025 Maryland laws. The court may consider them, the list is open through factor (16), and the whole list is subject to Family Law 9-101, 9-101.1 and 9-101.2.
Any prior court orders or agreements are one of the sixteen factors the court may consider. The document should identify existing orders and agreements affecting the child, with case numbers, rather than leaving the court to reconstruct the history.
The court shall articulate its findings of fact on the record or in writing, including its consideration of each factor listed in subsection (a). Because every factor must be addressed, an agreement that gives the court information on the factors is easier to act on than one that states only the outcome.
Where the court has reasonable grounds to believe a child has been abused or neglected by a party, it shall deny custody or visitation to that party unless it specifically finds no likelihood of further abuse or neglect, and may otherwise approve only supervised visitation. This overrides the factor analysis and cannot be waived by agreement.
The court shall consider evidence of abuse by a party against the other parent, the party's spouse, or any child in the household, including a child other than the one in the case, and on such a finding shall arrange custody or visitation to protect the child and the victim of the abuse.
The court may include as a condition of a custody or visitation order a requirement of at least ninety days' advance written notice of an intent to relocate, within or outside Maryland. The notice duty is not automatic, so parents who want it should ask for the condition; where it applies, a petition may be filed within twenty days and the court sets an expedited hearing.
A parent's proposal to relocate the residence of the parent or the child in a way that would make physical custody impracticable is a material change in circumstances. The document should record the parents' current addresses so a later proposal can be measured against them.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. Md. Code, Family Law 8-101 makes a written agreement between spouses valid and enforceable as to alimony, support, property rights and personal rights, and custody is not on that list. Family Law 8-103(a) then allows the court to modify any custody provision of a deed, agreement or settlement if the modification would be in the best interests of the child. The one codified effect an agreement has on the merits is that Family Law 9-201(a)(11) makes any prior court orders or agreements one of the sixteen factors the court may consider.
Yes. An agreement between parents is not a custody order. The parents file it with the court, and if the court determines the arrangement is in the child's best interest it may be written into an order, which the court can then enforce. Until that happens there is no order to enforce and no contempt remedy for a parent who departs from what was agreed.
Yes, and it does not need much to do it. Family Law 8-103(a) provides that the court may modify any provision of a deed, agreement or settlement with respect to the care, custody, education or support of a minor child if the modification would be in the best interests of the child. No heightened standard applies because the terms were agreed rather than decided. Family Law 8-105(b) confirms the point for divorce cases by leaving incorporated provisions subject to modification under 8-103, whether or not they were merged into the decree.
Sixteen, set out in Md. Code, Family Law 9-201(a), which took effect October 1, 2025 under chapter 483 of the 2025 Maryland laws. Before that date Maryland had no statutory factor list at all and the factors came from case law, so older summaries of Maryland custody law are describing a position that has been superseded. The list is not closed, because factor (16) is any other factor the court considers appropriate, and the whole list is expressly subject to Family Law 9-101, 9-101.1 and 9-101.2.
Yes, even though weighing them is discretionary. Family Law 9-201(a) says the court may consider the listed factors, which leaves the weight to the judge. Family Law 9-201(b) requires the court to articulate its findings of fact on the record or in writing, including its consideration of each factor listed in subsection (a). The practical effect is that a judge can decide a factor does not matter here but cannot pass over it in silence.
No. Maryland has no statutory presumption of joint custody, and no presumption for or against any particular arrangement. The 2025 legislative session included bills that would have created a rebuttable presumption of joint custody, and neither passed. The court works from the best interest standard and the factors in Family Law 9-201(a).
Family Law 8-105 sets out both. Provisions merged into a divorce decree are enforceable by the court's contempt power. Provisions that state they are incorporated but not merged are enforceable by contempt or as an independent contract not superseded by the decree. The distinction matters for property and alimony terms, but it does not insulate custody: 8-105(b) leaves incorporated provisions subject to modification under 8-103, and 8-103(a) reaches every custody provision.
Not by default, and this is the Maryland rule most often stated wrongly. Family Law 9-106(a)(1) provides that the court may include, as a condition of a custody or visitation order, a requirement that either party give at least ninety days' advance written notice of an intent to relocate the permanent residence of the party or the child, within or outside the State. Absent that condition in the order, no statutory notice duty applies. Where the condition exists, either party may petition within twenty days of the notice and the court sets an expedited hearing, and the court shall waive notice on a showing that it would expose the child or either party to abuse or for other good cause.
Family Law 9-202(b), also added in 2025, provides that a parent's proposal to relocate the residence of the parent or the child in a way that would make physical custody impracticable is a material change in circumstances. That removes the threshold argument about whether a relocation is a significant enough change to reopen custody, and moves the case to the best interest question. Maryland sets no mileage trigger and no state-line trigger anywhere in Family Law 9-106, and the statute does not assign the burden to either parent.
Not through a presumption, but through mandatory rules that override the factor analysis. Family Law 9-101 provides that where the court has reasonable grounds to believe a child has been abused or neglected by a party, it shall deny custody or visitation to that party unless it specifically finds there is no likelihood of further abuse or neglect, and supervised visitation is the only alternative it may order. Family Law 9-101.1 requires the court to consider evidence of abuse by a party against the other parent, the party's spouse, or any child in the household, and to arrange custody or visitation so as to protect both the child and the victim. Family Law 9-101.2 is a separate bar tied to a first or second degree murder conviction rather than a domestic violence provision. If any of this is present, it is a situation for a lawyer rather than a form.